Research Database

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Displaying 171 - 180 of 322
Dahinten, V. S., Arim, R. G., Guèvremont, A., & Kohen, D. E. (2014). The case for using administrative data to examine a population-based parenting intervention. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development, 7(2), 115.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Day, J. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2017). Mediators of parenting change within a web-based parenting program: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial of Triple P Online. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 6(3), 154.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Dittman, C. K., Farruggia, S. P., Palmer, M. L., Sanders, M. R., & Keown, L. J. (2014). Predicting success in an online parenting intervention: The role of child, parent, and family factors. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(2), 236.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Doherty, F. M., Calam, R., & Sanders, M. R. (2014). Erratum: “Positive Parenting Program (Triple P) for families of adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: a randomized controlled trial of self-directed Teen Triple P.” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(10), 1175.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Duncombe, M. E., Havighurst, S. S., Kehoe, C. E., Holland, K. A., Frankling, E. J., & Stargatt, R. (2016). Comparing an emotion-and a behavior-focused parenting program as part of a multsystemic intervention for child conduct problems. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45(3), 320–334.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Ehrensaft, M. K., Knous-Westfall, H. M., & Alonso, T. L. (2016). Web-based prevention of parenting difficulties in young, urban mothers enrolled in post-secondary education. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 37(6), 527–542.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Errázuriz, P., Cerfogli, C., Moreno, G., & Soto, G. (2016). Perception of Chilean parents on the triple P Program for improving parenting practices. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(11), 3440–3449.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Evans, G. A. (2014). Parenting skills training as an intervention for tic disorders (Doctoral dissertation, the University of Manchester). Retrieved from https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/54554997/FULL_TEXT.P…

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Evans, T., Boyd, R. N., Colditz, P., Sanders, M., & Whittingham, K. (2017). Baby triple p for parents of a very preterm infant: A case study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(2), 633–642.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Evans, T., Boyd, R. N., Colditz, P., Sanders, M., & Whittingham, K. (2017). Mother-very preterm infant relationship quality: RCT of baby Triple P. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(1), 284–295.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens