Research Database

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Displaying 241 - 250 of 322
Reese, R. J., Slone, N. C., Soares, N., & Sprang, R. (2015). Using telepsychology to provide a group parenting program: A preliminary evaluation of effectiveness. Psychological Services, 12(3), 274.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Reijneveld, S. A., Kleefman, M., & Jansen, D. E. (2015). Stepping Stones Triple P: The importance of putting the findings into context–a response to Tellegen and Sofronoff. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 36.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Ryan, R., O’Farrelly, C., & Ramchandani, P. (2017). Parenting and child mental health. London Journal of Primary Care, 9(6), 86–94.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Salmon, K., Dittman, C., Sanders, M., Burson, R., & Hammington, J. (2014). Does adding an emotion component enhance the Triple P− Positive Parenting Program? Journal of Family Psychology, 28(2), 244.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Sampaio, F. (2016). Prevention and treatment of externalizing behaviour problems in children through parenting interventions: An application of health economic methods (Doctoral dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis). Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:915262/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Sampaio, F., Barendregt, J. J., Feldman, I., Lee, Y. Y., Sawyer, M. G., Dadds, M. R., . . . Mihalopoulos, C. (2018). Population cost-effectiveness of the triple P parenting programme for the treatment of conduct disorder: An economic modelling study. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(7), 933–944.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Sampaio, F., Sarkadi, A., Salari, R., Zethraeus, N., & Feldman, I. (2015). Cost and effects of a universal parenting programme delivered to parents of preschoolers. The European Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 1035–1042.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Sanders, M., Calam, R., Durand, M., Liversidge, T., & Carmont, S. A. (2014). Correction: “Does self-directed and web-based support for parents enhance the effects of viewing a reality television series based on the Triple P–Positive Parenting Programme?” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(12), e7.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Sanders, M., Calam, R., Durand, M., Liversidge, T., & Carmont, S. A. (2014). Correction: “Does self-directed and web-based support for parents enhance the effects of viewing a reality television series based on the Triple P–Positive Parenting Programme?” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(12), e7.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Sanders, M. R., & Calam, R. (2016). Parenting information and advice and the mass media. In K. Durkin & H. R. Schaffer (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Developmental Psychology in Practice: Implementation and Impact (pp. 100–120). doi:10.1002/9781119095699

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens