Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1241 - 1250 of 1849, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Oppenheim-Weller, S., Zeira, A., & Mazursky, N. (2020). Evaluating SafeCare® in Israel: Benefits for the families. Child & Family Social Work, 25(3), 665–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12741

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Ordway, M. R., Sadler, L. S., Dixon, J., Close, N., Mayes, L., & Slade, A. (2013). Lasting effects of an interdisciplinary home visiting program on child behavior: Preliminary follow-up results of a randomized trial. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, in press.

Model(s) Reviewed: Minding the Baby® Home Visiting (MTB-HV)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Organization works with parents to improve learning. (2009). Report on Preschool Programs, 41(7), 7–8.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Organizational Research Services (2010). Evaluation of the Parent-Child Home Program/Play & Learn Group demonstration project 2005-2010: Final Report. Business Partnership for Early Learning. https://parentchildplus.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Evaluation-of-th…

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Ormston, R., & McConville, S. (2012). Evaluation of the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in NHS Lothian, Scotland: 3rd report—Infancy. Edinburgh, Scotland: ScotCen Social Research.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ormston, R., & McConville, S. (2013). Evaluation of the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in NHS Lothian, Scotland: 4th report—Toddlerhood. Edinburgh, Scotland: ScotCen Social Research.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ormston, R., McConville, S., & Gordon, J. (2012). Evaluation of the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in NHS Lothian, Scotland: 2nd report—Late pregnancy and postpartum. Edinburgh, Scotland: ScotCen Social Research; Glasgow, Scotland: Jacki Gordon & Associates.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ormston, R., McConville, S., & Gordon, J. (2014). Evaluation of the Family Nurse Partnership Programme in NHS Lothian, Scotland: Summary of key learning and implications. Edinburgh, Scotland: ScotCen Social Research; Glasgow, Scotland: Jacki Gordon & Associates.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Oro, V., Clifford, S., Shaw, D., Wilson, M., & Lemery–Chalfant, K. (2019). Intervention effects mitigate the association between polygenic risk for alcohol use and inhibitory control in middle childhood. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 29, S160–S161.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Oshana, D., Harding, K., Friedman, L., & Holton, J. K. (2005). Rethinking Healthy Families: A continuous responsibility. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(3), 219–228.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download