Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1911 - 1920 of 1998, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Wesch, D., & Lutzker, J. R. (1991). A comprehensive 5-year evaluation of project 12-ways: An ecobehavioral program for treating and preventing child abuse neglect. Journal of Family Violence, 6(1), 17-35.

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Wessels, I., & Ward, C. L. (2016). Battered women and parenting: Acceptability of an evidence-based parenting programme to women in shelters. Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health, 28(1), 21–31.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

West, A. L. (2015). The benefits and costs of caring: A mixed-methods study of Early Head Start home visitors [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/benefits-costs-caring-mix…

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible grey literature

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Westat, Chapin Hall Center for Children, & James Bell Associates (2002). Evaluation of family preservation and reunification programs: Final report. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Westbrook, T. R. (2012). Supporting optimal child development through Early Head Start and Head Start programs: Secondary data analyses of FACES and EHSREP: An introduction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(4), 571.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study `

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Westheimer, M. (2003). On Hugh McLean's evaluation of HIPPY outcomes in South Africa. In M. Westheimer (Ed.), Parents making a difference: International research on the Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) program (Chapter 12).The Hebrew University Magnes Press.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Westheimer, M. (2003). Ready or not: One home-based response to the school readiness dilemma. In M. Westheimer (Ed.), Parents making a difference: International research on the Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) program (Chapter 1).The Hebrew University Magnes Press.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Westrupp, E. M., Northam, E., Lee, K. J., Scratch, S. E., & Cameron, F. (2015). Reducing and preventing internalizing and externalizing behavior problems in children with type 1 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial of the Triple P‐Positive Parenting Program. Pediatric Diabetes, 16(7), 554–563.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Wettach, R., & Aebi, M. (2016). Pilotstudie zur Wirksamkeit einer multimodalen Gruppenbehandlung für Kinder mit einer Störung des Sozialverhaltens mit oppositionellem, aufsässigem Verhalten in der klinischen Grundversorgung [Pilot study on the effectiveness of a multimodal group treatment for children with oppositional defiant disorder in clinical primary care]. Zeitschrift fur Kinder-und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 44(3), 220–230.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Wheeler, W. H. (1994). A study of the Missouri Parents as Teachers program and its effect on the readiness skills of children entering kindergarten in southwest Missouri public schools. Blue Eye, MO: Blue Eye School District.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download