Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1931 - 1940 of 1946, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Zajicek-Farber, M., Wall, S. M., Kisker, E., E., Luze, G. J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Comparing service use of Early Head Start families of children with and without disabilities. Journal of Family Social Work, 14(2), 159-178. doi:10.1080/1052

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program; Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zamora, I. (2007). The Healthy Steps program: Helping families grow. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 68(5B).

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zapart, S., Knight, J., & Kemp, L. (2016). ‘It was easier because I had help’: Mothers’ reflections on the long-term impact of sustained nurse home visiting. Maternal and child health journal, 20, 196–204.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Zarnowiecki, D., Nguyen, H., Hampton, C., Boffa, J., & Segal, L. (2018). The Australian Nurse-Family Partnership program for aboriginal mothers and babies: Describing client complexity and implications for program delivery. Midwifery, 65, 72–81.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zeanah, C. H., Berlin, L. J., & Boris, N. W. (2011). Practitioner review: Clinical applications of attachment theory and research for infants and young children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(8), 819–833.

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up (ABC) -Infant, Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zeanah, C. H., Berlin, L. J., & Boris, N. W. (2011). Practitioner review: Clinical applications of attachment theory and research for infants and young children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(8), 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02399.x

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up (ABC) -Infant

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zeanah, P. D., Larrieu, J. A., Boris, N. W., & Nagle, G. A. (2006). Nurse home visiting: Perspectives from nurses. Infant Mental Health Journal, 27(1), 41-54.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zemp, M., Milek, A., Cummings, E. M., & Bodenmann, G. (2017). Longitudinal interrelations between dyadic coping and coparenting conflict in couples. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(8), 2276–2290.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zemp, M., Milek, A., Cummings, E. M., Cina, A., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). How couple-and parenting-focused programs affect child behavioral problems: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(3), 798–810.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zemp, M., Milek, A., Davies, P. T., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Improved child problem behavior enhances the parents’ relationship quality: A randomized trial. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(8), 896.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download