Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 561 - 570 of 1946, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Floyd, R. M., & Taylor, J. (1991). Keeping families together: The homebuilders model. Community Alternatives, 3(2), 145-147.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Forsythe, P. (1992). Homebuilders and family preservation. Children and Youth Services Review, 14(1-2), 37-47.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Forte, S. (2019). Examination of an intergenerational literacy curriculum for parents and children in Liberia: A case study [Doctoral dissertation, Cabrini University].

Model(s) Reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Fosco, G. M., Frank, J. L., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2013). Opening the “Black Box”: family check-up intervention effects on self-regulation that prevents growth in problem behavior and substance use. Journal of School Psychology, 51(4), 455–468.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M. J., Connell, A. M., & Stormshak, E. A. (2016). Preventing adolescent depression with the family check-up: Examining family conflict as a mechanism of change. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(1), 82.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model. Development and Psychopathology, 26(2), 305–318.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model. Development and Psychopathology, 26(2), 305–318.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: No eligible outcomes
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2016). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model: Corrigendum. Development and Psychopathology, 28(4), 1565.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: No eligible outcomes
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Foskolos, K. (2015). The acceptability and efficacy of a brief universal preventive parenting intervention for child behavioural and emotional disorders (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford). Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cb6b28fb-12ad-4e81-b6d3-2134f7dfaec8

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Foulon, S., Greacen, T., Pasquet, B., Dugravier, R., Saïas, T., Guedeney, N., . . . CAPEDP Study Group. (2015). Predictors of study attrition in a randomized controlled trial evaluating a perinatal home-visiting program with mothers with psychosocial vulnerabilities. PloS One, 10(11), e0142495.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download