Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 661 - 670 of 1725, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Hayward, S. (2000). Nurse home visits during pregnancy and early childhood had positive effects on aspects of maternal life course 3 years later... Commentary on Kitzman, H., Olds, D. L., Sidora, K., et al. Enduring effects of nurse home visitation on maternal life course: A 3-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JAMA, 283:1983-1989. Evidence-Based Nursing, 3(4), 115-115.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study; Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hayward, R. A. (2009). Neighborhood conditions, father involvement, parenting competence, and behavior problems in a sample of children at risk for neglect: A structural equation model. (University of Maryland, Baltimore; 0373 Advisor: Diane DePanfilis). Dissertation Abstracts International, 70 (04A), 130-1428. (AAI3355088)

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connections (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Inelligible study design.
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hayward, K., & Cameron, G. (2002). The nature and effectiveness of intensive family preservation services. Waterloo, ON: Partnerships for Children and Families Project, Faculty of Social Work, Wilfrid Laurier University.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: The text of this study did not arrive in time for the review.
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Heads, T. C. (1996). A social interactional approach, vol. 5: Family Connections. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 6 (1), 108-109.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connections (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Healy, K. L., & Sanders, M. R. (2014). Randomized controlled trial of a family intervention for children bullied by peers. Behavior Therapy, 45(6), 760–777.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Healy, K. L., & Sanders, M. R. (2018). Mechanisms through which supportive relationships with parents and peers mitigate victimization, depression and internalizing problems in children bullied by peers. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 49(5), 800–813.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Healthy Families America. (1996). A role for nurses: Healthy Families America. American Nurse, 28(3), 20.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: HomVEE could not obtain the text of this manuscript
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Heinrichs, N., Kliem, S., & Hahlweg, K. (2014). Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Triple P group for parent and child outcomes. Prevention Science, 15(2), 233–245.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Heinrichs, N., Kliem, S., & Hahlweg, K. (2017). Addendum: “Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of triple P group for parent and child outcomes.” Prevention Science, 18(4), 491–503.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Heinrichs, N., Kliem, S., & Hahlweg, K. (2017). Addendum: “Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of triple P group for parent and child outcomes.” Prevention Science, 18(4), 491–503.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download