Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, read about our Systematic Review Handbook of Procedures and Evidence Standards.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Search By

Displaying 1601 - 1610 of 2490
Pickering, J. A., & Sanders, M. R. (2016). The protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a brief intervention for parents of children experiencing sibling conflict. Clinical Psychologist, 20(2), 86–93.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Pickering, J. A., & Sanders, M. R. (2016). Reducing child maltreatment by making parenting programs available to all parents: A case example using the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(4), 398–407.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2016). Addendum: “Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The U.S. Triple P system population trial.” Prevention Science, 17(3), 410–416.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2015). Erratum: “Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The US Triple P system population trial.” Prevention Science, 16(1), 168.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2015). Erratum: “Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The US Triple P system population trial.” Prevention Science, 16(1), 168.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2016). Addendum: “Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: The U.S. Triple P system population trial.” Prevention Science, 17(3), 410–416.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Proctor, K. B., & Brestan-Knight, E. (2016). Evaluating the use of assessment paradigms for preventive interventions: A review of the Triple P—Positive Parenting Program. Children and Youth Services Review, 62, 72–82.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Rahmqvist, J., Wells, M. B., & Sarkadi, A. (2014). Conscious parenting: a qualitative study on Swedish parents’ motives to participate in a parenting program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(5), 934–944.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Ramaekers, S., & Vandezande, A. (2013). ‘Parents need to become independent problem solvers’: a critical reading of the current parenting culture through the case of Triple P. Ethics and Education, 8(1), 77–88.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Reese, R. J., Slone, N. C., Soares, N., & Sprang, R. (2015). Using telepsychology to provide a group parenting program: A preliminary evaluation of effectiveness. Psychological Services, 12(3), 274.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens