Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, read about our Systematic Review Handbook of Procedures and Evidence Standards.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Search By

Displaying 1661 - 1670 of 2490
Zimmermann, T. (2016). Kommunikation in der Familie [Family communication]. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 164(7), 565–573.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Hopman, M., De Winter, M., & Koops, W. (2013). Values and youth care interventions: The case of Triple P. British Journal of Social Work, 44(6), 1526–1544.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Shapiro, C. J., Prinz, R. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Sustaining use of an evidence-based parenting intervention: Practitioner perspectives. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(6), 1615–1624.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Williams, L. K., McCarthy, M. C., Burke, K., Anderson, V., & Rinehart, N. (2016). Addressing behavioral impacts of childhood leukemia: A feasibility pilot randomized controlled trial of a group videoconferencing parenting intervention. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 24, 61–69.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens

Özyurt, G., Dinsever, C., Caliskan, Z., & Evgin, D. (2018). Can positive parenting program (Triple P) be useful to prevent child maltreatment? Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 60(3), 286.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Garcia, A. R., DeNard, C., Ohene, S., Morones, S. M., & Connaughton, C. (2018). ‘I am more than my past’: Parents’ attitudes and perceptions of the Positive Parenting Program in Child Welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 286–297.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Day, J. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2018). Do parents benefit from help when completing a self-guided parenting program online? A randomized controlled trial comparing triple p online with and without telephone support. Behavior therapy, 49(6), 1020–1038.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens

Özyurt, G., Dinsever, Ç., Çalişkan, Z., & Evgin, D. (2018). Effects of Triple P on Digital Technological Device Use in Preschool Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(1), 280–289.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Haskett, M. E., Armstrong, J., Neal, S. C., & Aldianto, K. (2018). Perceptions of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program seminars among parents experiencing homelessness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(6), 1957–1967.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens
Keown, L. J., Sanders, M. R., Franke, N., & Shepherd, M. (2018). Te Whānau Pou Toru: a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a culturally adapted low-intensity variant of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program for indigenous Māori families in New Zealand. Prevention Science, 19(7) 954–965.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Rating: Does not pass screens