Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 741 - 750 of 2489, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model. Development and Psychopathology, 26(2), 305–318.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2014). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model. Development and Psychopathology, 26(2), 305–318.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: No eligible outcomes
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2016). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model: Corrigendum. Development and Psychopathology, 28(4), 1565.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: No eligible outcomes
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Foskolos, K. (2015). The acceptability and efficacy of a brief universal preventive parenting intervention for child behavioural and emotional disorders (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford). Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:cb6b28fb-12ad-4e81-b6d3-2134f7dfaec8

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Foulon, S., Greacen, T., Pasquet, B., Dugravier, R., Saïas, T., Guedeney, N., . . . CAPEDP Study Group. (2015). Predictors of study attrition in a randomized controlled trial evaluating a perinatal home-visiting program with mothers with psychosocial vulnerabilities. PloS One, 10(11), e0142495.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fountain, M. S. (2002). A case study of community collaboration characteristics in Healthy Families America sites. (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2002); 2383 Adviser: Director Mary Katherine O'Connor. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63 (10A), 290-3727. (AAI3068428)

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Frank, T. J., Keown, L. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Enhancing father engagement and interparental teamwork in an evidence-based parenting intervention: A randomized-controlled trial of outcomes and processes. Behavior Therapy, 46(6), 749–763.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fraser, M., & Haapla, D. (1987). Home-based family treatment:  A quantitative-qualitative assessment. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 12(1), 1-23.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fraser, M., Pecora, P. J., & Haapla, D. A. (1991). Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family peservation services. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design; Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fraser, M. W., Pecora, P. J., Popuang, C., & Haapala, D. A. (1992). Event history analysis: A proportional hazards perspective on modeling outcomes in intensive family preservation services. Journal of Social Service Research, 16(1-2), 123-158.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download