Research Manuscript Database
Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.
Search By
Matone, M., O’Reilly, A. L. R., Luan, X., Localio, R., & Rubin, D. M. (2012). Home visitation program effectiveness and the influence of community behavioral norms: A propensity score matched analysis of prenatal smoking cessation. BMC Public Health, 12, 1016.
Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Matone, M., O’Reilly, A., Luan, X., Localio, A., & Rubin, D. (2012). Emergency department visits and hospitalizations for injuries among infants and children following statewide implementation of a home visitation model. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 16, 1754–1761.
Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 18(3), 274-283.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 274–283.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness and social validity of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in Japanese society. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 87-91.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1525–1525.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matthew, R. F., Wang, M. Q., Bellamy, N., & Copeland, E. (2005). Test of efficacy of model family strengthening programs. American Journal of Health Studies, 20(3), 164–170.
Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)
Mauricio, A. M., Rudo–Stern, J., Dishion, T. J., Letham, K., & Lopez, M. (2019). Provider readiness and adaptations of competency drivers during scale–up of the Family Check–Up. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 40(1), 51–68.
Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Mauricio, A. M., Rudo–Stern, J., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., Gill, A. M., Lundgren, J. S., & Thunberg, J. (2018). Facilitators and barriers in cross–country transport of evidence–based preventive interventions: A case study using the Family Check–Up. Prevention Science, 1–11.
Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Mazzucchelli, T. G., Jenkins, M., & Sofronoff, K. (2018). Building Bridges Triple P: Pilot study of a behavioural family intervention for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 76, 46–55.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting