Research database

Displaying 1081 - 1090 of 2490
Judson, C. J. (2007). The effect of the Even Start early childhood program upon elementary school student achievement, attendance, grade progression, special education placement and disciplinary referrals. (University of Texas at Austin; 0227 Advisor: Adviser James R. Yates). Dissertation Abstracts International, 68 (10A), 131-4190. (AAI3285940)
Model(s) reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Juffer, F., & Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J. (2018). Working with Video‐feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP‐SD): A case study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(8), 1346–1357.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Juffer, F., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2017). Pairing attachment theory and social learning theory in video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 189–194.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens

Juffer, F., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (Eds.). (2012). Promoting Positive Parenting: An Attachment-Based Intervention. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.

Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Juffer, F., Struis, E., Werner, C., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2017). Effective preventive interventions to support parents of young children: Illustrations from the Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD). Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 45(3), 202–214.
Model(s) reviewed: Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting–Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP–SD)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Julian, M. M., Muzik, M., Jester, J. M., Handelzalts, J., Erickson, N., Stringer, M., Brophy-Herb, H., Ribaudo, J., Huth-Bocks, A., Lawler, J., Stacks, A., Rosenblum, K. L., & Michigan Collaborative for Infant Mental Health Research. (2021). Relationships heal: Reducing harsh parenting and child abuse potential with relationship-based parent-infant home visiting. Children and Youth Services Review, 128, Article 106135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106135
Model(s) reviewed: Michigan Model of Infant Mental Health-Home Visiting (Michigan IMH-HV)
Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Julnes, G., Konefal, M., Pindur, W., & Kim, P. (1994). Community-based perinatal care for disadvantaged adolescents: Evaluation of the Resource Mothers Program. Journal of Community Health, 19(1), 41–53.
Model(s) reviewed: Resource Mothers Program
Rating: Low
June, K. J., Lee, J. Y., & Cho, S. H. (2021). Infant mother's experiences with the sustained nurse home-visiting program. Journal of The Korean Society of Maternal and Child Health25(1), 31–41.
Model(s) reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Jung, S., & Stone, S. (2008). Sociodemographic and programmatic moderators of Early Head Start: Evidence from the national Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project. Children & Schools, 30(3), 149–157.
Model(s) reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option
Rating: Does not pass screens
Kaehler, L. (2009). [Review of the book The Healthy Families America initiative: Integrating research, theory, and practice, edited by J. Galano]. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 10(3), 368–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299730902956903
Model(s) reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Rating: Does not pass screens