REACH of Louisville. (n.d.). Birth outcomes: Prematurity, low birth weight, and very low birth weight—HANDS program 2002–2007. Louisville, KY: Author.
Research database
Displaying 1871 - 1880 of 2490
Model(s) reviewed: Health Access Nurturing Development Services (HANDS) Program
Reading, R. (2016). Effectiveness of a nurse-led intensive home-visitation programme for first-time teenage mothers (building blocks): A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Child: Care, Health & Development, 42(1), 146–147.
Model(s) reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Rebello Britto, P. & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). HIPPY program’s influence on establishing home-school partnerships and enhancing children’s school readiness. In M. Westheimer (Ed.), Parents making a difference: International research on the Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY) program (Chapter 15).The Hebrew University Magnes Press.
Model(s) reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®
Rector, E. J. (2002). Early Head Start: Home visiting and parenting group program uptake. An implementation study. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, 2002; 0250 Adviser: Chair Susan P. Kemp. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63 (05A), 240-1999. (AAI3053547)
Model(s) reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option
Reese, R. J., Slone, N. C., Soares, N., & Sprang, R. (2015). Using telepsychology to provide a group parenting program: A preliminary evaluation of effectiveness. Psychological Services, 12(3), 274.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Reijneveld, S. A., Kleefman, M., & Jansen, D. E. (2015). Stepping Stones Triple P: The importance of putting the findings into context–a response to Tellegen and Sofronoff. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 36.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Reinhold, D. (2007). Integration von migrantenkindern – sprachprogramme im vergleich [Integration of migrant children – comparison of language programs]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.
Model(s) reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®
Reiniger, A. (2003). Building community campus partnerships in underserved communities: An essential step to effective services. Case study for the principles of partnership. Best beginnings: A child abuse prevention program in New York City. New York, NY: Community Campus Partnerships for Health (CCPH) Fellows Program.
Model(s) reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Reinke, W. M., Splett, J. D., Robeson, E. N., & Offutt, C. A. (2009). Combining school and family interventions for the prevention and early intervention of disruptive behavior problems in children: A public health perspective. Psychology in the Schools, 46(1), 33–43.
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Research and Training Associates, Inc. (2006). BIA Baby FACE program evaluation study: 2005 report. Overland Park, KS: Author.
Model(s) reviewed: Baby FACE, an adaptation of Parents as Teachers