Research database

Displaying 311 - 320 of 2490
Burgess, C., Cheers, B., & Fisher, D. (2004). Early intervention parenting assistance for rural and remote families in the south. Presentation at the International Rural Human Services Conference—Beyond Geographical and Disciplinary Boundaries, Halifa, Australia.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Burns, J. L., Mirotta, J. A., Duncan, A. M., Darlington, G., Haines, J., Shivappa, N., Hébert, J.R., Ma, D. W. L., & the Guelph Family Health Study. (2022). Intakes of PUFA are low in preschool-aged children in the Guelph Family Health Study pilot cohort. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 47(9), 973–978. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2021-0618
Model(s) reviewed: Guelph Family Health Study (GFHS)
Rating: Does not pass screens
Burns, M. K. (2002). Cementing the cracks: A qualitative study of how parents interpret their experiences as recipients of family preservation services. (Pennsylvania State University; 0176 Advisor: Daniele Flannery). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63 (05A), 267-1666. (AAI3051628)
Model(s) reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®
Rating: Does not pass screens
Burrell, L., McFarlane, E., Tandon, D., Fuddy, L., Duggan, A., & Leaf, P. (2009). Home visitor relationship security: Association with perceptions of work, satisfaction, and turnover. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(5), 592-6.
Model(s) reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Burruss-Cousins, K. M. (2022). The interplay of home visitors’ personal and professional identities in effectively screening and supporting women around sensitive topics [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore]. UMB Digital Archive. https://archive.hshsl.umaryland.edu/bitstream/handle/10713/19142/Burrus…
Model(s) reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Rating: Does not pass screens
Bustos, C. E. (2011). Parent experiences of a family-centered intervention: Examining ethnocultural group differences (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon).
Model(s) reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children
Rating: Does not pass screens
Butler-Coyne, H., Hare, D., Walker, S., Wieck, A., & Wittkowski, A. (2017). Acceptability of a positive parenting Programme on a mother and baby unit: Q-methodology with staff. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(2), 623–632.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Does not pass screens
Butler, H., Hare, D., Walker, S., Wieck, A., & Wittkowski, A. (2014). The acceptability and feasibility of the Baby Triple P Positive Parenting Programme on a mother and baby unit: Q-methodology with mothers with severe mental illness. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 17(5), 455–463.
Model(s) reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Buzhardt, J., Greenwood, C. R., Jia, F., Walker, D., Schneider, N., Larson, A. L., Valdovinos, M., & McConnell, S. R. (2020). Technology to guide data-driven intervention decisions: Effects on language growth of young children at risk for language delay. Exceptional Children87(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402920938003
Model(s) reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option
Rating: Does not pass screens
Buzhardt, J., Greenwood, C. R., Walker, D., Anderson, R., Howard, W., & Carta, J. J. (2011). Effects of web-based support on Early Head Start home visitors’ use of evidence-based intervention decision making and growth in children’s expressive communication. NHSA Dialog: A Research-to-Practice Journal for the Early Childhood Field, 14(3) 121-146.
Model(s) reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option
Rating: Low