Family Check-Up^® For Children

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2021

Effects shown in research

Maternal health

Findings rated high

Shaw, D. S., Connell, A., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F. (2009). Improvements in maternal depression as a mediator of intervention effects on early childhood problem behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 417–439.

Family Check-Up^® For Children

Show findings details

Outcome measure	Effect	Follow-up timing	Sample	Sample size	Intervention group	Comparison group	Group difference	Effect size	Statistical significance	Notes
Maternal Depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), Age 3, SEM, Figure 2	FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect	Age 3	WIC sites in Pittsburgh, PA, Eugene, OR, and Charlottesville, VA	731 mothers	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not available	Statistically significant, p<0.05²	footnote272 Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29 Authors used structural equation models to estimate the impact, and reported a coefficient, standard error, and p-value.
Maternal Depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), Age 3, SEM, Figure 3	FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect	Age 3	WIC sites in Pittsburgh, PA, Eugene, OR, and Charlottesville, VA	731 mothers	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not available	Statistically significant, p<0.05²	footnote272 Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29 Authors used structural equation models to estimate the impact, and reported a coefficient, standard error, and p-value.
Maternal Depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), Age 3, SEM, Figure 4	FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect	Age 3	WIC sites in Pittsburgh, PA, Eugene, OR, and Charlottesville, VA	731 mothers	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not available	Statistically significant, p<0.05²	footnote272 Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29 Authors used structural equation models to estimate the impact, and reported a coefficient, standard error, and p-value.
Maternal Depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), Age 3, SEM, Figure 5	FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect	Age 3	WIC sites in Pittsburgh, PA, Eugene, OR, and Charlottesville, VA	731 mothers	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not available	Statistically significant, p<0.05²	footnote272 Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29 Authors used structural equation models to estimate the impact, and reported a coefficient, standard error, and p-value.
Maternal Depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), Age 3, SEM, Figure 6	FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect	Age 3	WIC sites in Pittsburgh, PA, Eugene, OR, and Charlottesville, VA	731 mothers	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not available	Statistically significant, p<0.05²	footnote272 Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29 Authors used structural equation models to estimate the impact, and reported a coefficient, standard error, and p-value.
Maternal Depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), Age 3, SEM, Figure 7	FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect	Age 3	WIC sites in Pittsburgh, PA, Eugene, OR, and Charlottesville, VA	731 mothers	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not available	Statistically significant, p<0.05²	footnote272 Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29 Authors used structural equation models to estimate the impact, and reported a coefficient, standard error, and p-value.
Maternal Depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), Age 3, Autoregressive model	FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect	Age 3	WIC sites in Pittsburgh, PA, Eugene, OR, and Charlottesville, VA	731 mothers	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Study reported = 0.18	Statistically significant, p<0.05¹	footnote271 Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29 Authors used an autoregressive model to estimate the impact, and reported a coefficient, standard error, and effect size.
Maternal Depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), Age 3, Correlation	FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect	Age 3	WIC sites in Pittsburgh, PA, Eugene, OR, and Charlottesville, VA	651 mothers	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	Not available	Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Findings rated moderate

Gardner, F., Connell, A., Trentacosta, C. J., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2009). Moderators of outcome in a brief family-centered intervention for preventing early problem behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(3), 543–553.

Family Check-Up^® For Children

Show findings details

Outcome measure	Effect	Follow-up timing	Sample	Sample size	Intervention group	Comparison group	Group difference	Effect size	Statistical significance	Notes
Maternal Depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale), Age 3, Mean and SD	FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect	Age 3	WIC sites in Pittsburgh, PA, Eugene, OR, and Charlottesville, VA	651 mothers	Unadjusted mean = 14.62	Unadjusted mean = 16.26	Mean difference = -1.64	HomVEE calculated = -0.15	Not statistically significant, p=0.06	footnote162 Submitted by user on Fri, 03/15/2019 - 14:29 Negative value is favorable to the intervention.

View Revisions