Healthy Families America (HFA)® Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2024

Effects shown in research

Child development and school readiness

Findings rated high

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
BSID Cognitive score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 Children with complete medical record data, Alaska trial 249 children Adjusted mean = 88.00 Adjusted mean = 84.80 Mean difference = 3.20 Not available Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
BSID percentage within normal limits on cognitive
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 Children with complete medical record data, Alaska trial 249 children % (adjusted) = 58.00 Adjusted mean % = 48.00 OR = 1.55 HomVEE calculated = 0.24 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
BSID percentage within normal limits on psychomotor
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 Children with complete medical record data, Alaska trial 249 children % (adjusted) = 85.00 Adjusted mean % = 80.00 OR = 1.36 HomVEE calculated = 0.21 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
BSID Psychomotor score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 Children with complete medical record data, Alaska trial 249 children Adjusted mean = 98.10 Adjusted mean = 96.00 Mean difference = 2.10 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CBCL percentage with externalizing scores in normal range
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 Children in custody of biological mother at year 2 follow-up interview, Alaska trial 249 children % (adjusted) = 82.00 Adjusted mean % = 77.00 OR = 1.48 HomVEE calculated = 0.19 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
CBCL percentage with internalizing scores in normal range
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 Children in custody of biological mother at year 2 follow-up interview, Alaska trial 249 children % (adjusted) = 87.00 Adjusted mean % = 79.00 OR = 2.06 HomVEE calculated = 0.35 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
CBCL total externalizing score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 Children in custody of biological mother at year 2 follow-up interview, Alaska trial 249 children Adjusted mean = 50.80 Adjusted mean = 53.00 Mean difference = -2.20 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CBCL total internalizing score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 2 Children in custody of biological mother at year 2 follow-up interview, Alaska trial 249 children Adjusted mean = 48.20 Adjusted mean = 51.00 Mean difference = -2.80 Not available Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
Aggressive behaviors (CBCL)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean = 6.99 Adjusted mean = 6.72 Mean difference = 0.27 Study reported = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Anxious, depressed (CBCL)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.89 Adjusted mean = 2.97 Mean difference = -0.08 Study reported = -0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Attention problems (CBCL)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean = 4.77 Adjusted mean = 4.75 Mean difference = 0.02 Study reported = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage participating in a gifted program
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean % = 5.38 Adjusted mean % = 1.99 OR = 2.80 Not available Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Percentage receiving remedial services
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean % = 32.83 Adjusted mean % = 33.31 OR = 0.98 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage receiving special education
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean % = 12.33 Adjusted mean % = 16.74 OR = 0.70 Not available Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Percentage repeating a grade
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean % = 12.33 Adjusted mean % = 16.74 OR = 0.98 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Percentage skipping school more than once
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean % = 2.40 Adjusted mean % = 2.20 OR = 1.08 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Rule-breaking behavior (CBCL)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean = 2.74 Adjusted mean = 2.66 Mean difference = 0.08 Study reported = 0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Social problems (CBCL)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean = 1.31 Adjusted mean = 1.15 Mean difference = 0.16 Study reported = -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Withdrawn, depressed (CBCL)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
7 year New York sample 897 mothers Adjusted mean = 1.47 Adjusted mean = 1.54 Mean difference = -0.07 Study reported = -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), total competence score

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months old

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

1124 children Not reported Not reported Difference = 0.00 Not available

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported.

Received any early intervention services (%)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months old

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

1101 mothers Not reported Not reported Difference = 0.00 HomVEE calculated = -0.09

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported.

Use of nonparental child care

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months old

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

1096 children Not reported Not reported Difference = -0.02 HomVEE calculated = -0.04

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

The statistical significance after adjusting for multiple comparisons is reported.

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
BSID, Mental Development Index (MDI)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 422 children Mean = 105.00 Mean = 102.50 Mean difference = 2.50 HomVEE calculated = 0.23 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
BSID, Motor MDI
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 1 Full sample, San Diego trial 422 children Mean = 113.50 Mean = 113.00 Mean difference = 0.50 HomVEE calculated = 0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CBCL Aggressive T score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 382 children Mean = 53.50 Mean = 53.60 Mean difference = -0.10 HomVEE calculated = -0.02 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CBCL Anxious/Depressed T score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 382 children Mean = 53.50 Mean = 54.30 Mean difference = -0.80 HomVEE calculated = -0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CBCL Behavior Problems
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 382 children Mean = 49.70 Mean = 51.10 Mean difference = -1.40 HomVEE calculated = -0.15 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CBCL Destructive T score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 382 children Mean = 53.60 Mean = 53.35 Mean difference = 0.30 HomVEE calculated = 0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CBCL Externalizing problems T score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 382 children Mean = 49.40 Mean = 49.90 Mean difference = -0.50 HomVEE calculated = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CBCL Internalizing problems T score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 382 children Mean = 50.90 Mean = 52.60 Mean difference = -1.70 HomVEE calculated = -0.17 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CBCL Sleep problems T score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 382 children Mean = 52.30 Mean = 52.70 Mean difference = -0.40 HomVEE calculated = -0.09 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
CBCL Somatic problems T score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 382 children Mean = 53.80 Mean = 55.20 Mean difference = -1.40 HomVEE calculated = -0.24 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
CBCL Withdrawn T score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 382 children Mean = 55.10 Mean = 56.10 Mean difference = -1.00 HomVEE calculated = -0.13 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Stanford Binet Abstract/Visual Reasoning SAS
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 children Mean = 90.60 Mean = 90.50 Mean difference = 0.10 HomVEE calculated = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Stanford Binet Communication Survey
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 children Mean = 101.80 Mean = 101.90 Mean difference = -0.10 HomVEE calculated = -0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Stanford Binet Partial Composite
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 children Mean = 91.30 Mean = 91.30 Mean difference = 0.00 HomVEE calculated = 0.00 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Stanford Binet Short Term Memory SAS
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 children Mean = 98.60 Mean = 97.80 Mean difference = 0.80 HomVEE calculated = 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Stanford Binet Sum of Area SAS
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 children Mean = 326.90 Mean = 331.60 Mean difference = -4.70 HomVEE calculated = -0.06 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Stanford Binet Verbal Reasoning Memory SAS
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Year 3 Full sample, San Diego trial 412 children Mean = 86.50 Mean = 87.30 Mean difference = -0.80 HomVEE calculated = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), total problem score (fixed effect random slope analysis)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months old

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

1126 children Not reported Not reported Not reported Study reported = -0.07

Not statistically significant, p= 0.15

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), total problem score (restricted maximum likelihood analysis)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months old

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

1126 children Not reported Not reported Not reported Study reported = -0.07

Not statistically significant, p= 0.23

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), total problem score (split-sample analysis)

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

15 months old

HFA vs. Resource referral RCT (MIHOPE), 2012-2015, United States, full sample

1126 children Not reported Not reported Difference = -0.10 Study reported = -0.10

Not statistically significant, p= 0.08

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Findings rated moderate

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
ASQ Communication score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months Program group children not affected by substance abuse,
NY Best Beginnings trial
359 children Mean = 55.70 Mean = 55.30 Mean difference = 0.40 HomVEE calculated = 0.07 Statistical significance not reported
ASQ Composite score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months Program group children not affected by substance abuse,
NY Best Beginnings trial
359 children Mean = 54.80 Mean = 54.00 Mean difference = 0.80 HomVEE calculated = 0.15 Statistical significance not reported
ASQ Fine Motor score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months Program group children not affected by substance abuse,
NY Best Beginnings trial
359 children Mean = 55.10 Mean = 54.20 Mean difference = 0.90 HomVEE calculated = 0.12 Statistical significance not reported
ASQ Gross Motor score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months Program group children not affected by substance abuse,
NY Best Beginnings trial
359 children Mean = 52.90 Mean = 51.80 Mean difference = 1.10 HomVEE calculated = 0.12 Statistical significance not reported
ASQ Social score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
6 months Program group children not affected by substance abuse,
NY Best Beginnings trial
359 children Mean = 53.70 Mean = 54.20 Mean difference = -0.50 HomVEE calculated = -0.06 Statistical significance not reported
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Child has IEP or 504 plan

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

8 years

HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample

370 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.27 Unadjusted proportion = 0.30 Mean difference = -0.02 HomVEE calculated = -0.07

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Child in afterschool program

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

8 years

HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample

368 children Adjusted proportion = 0.55 Adjusted proportion = 0.42 Odds ratio = 1.71 HomVEE calculated = 0.32

Statistically significant, p <.05

Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - externalizing

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

8 years

HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample

366 children Unadjusted mean = 5.58 Unadjusted mean = 5.60 Mean difference = -0.02 HomVEE calculated = -0.01

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - internalizing

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

8 years

HFM vs. comparison, Massachusetts Healthy Families Evaluation 2 (MHFE -2), Tier 6 full sample

360 children Unadjusted mean = 3.48 Unadjusted mean = 3.51 Mean difference = -0.03 HomVEE calculated = -0.01

Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05

Submitted by user on

Negative effect is favorable to the intervention.

Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance
PLS-3 Score
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 Children with developmental testing results, Hawaii trial 513 children Adjusted mean = 87.90 Adjusted mean = 87.10 Mean difference = 0.80 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Prevalence of any delays (PLS-3 score ≤ 85)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 Children with developmental testing results, Hawaii trial 513 children % (adjusted) = 48.00 Adjusted mean % = 49.00 OR = 0.97 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Prevalence of severe delays (PLS-3 score ≤ 70)
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
Age 3 Children with developmental testing results, Hawaii trial 513 children % (adjusted) = 9.00 Adjusted mean % = 11.00 OR = 0.80 Not available Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Healthy Families America (HFA)®
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
Days absent
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
1st grade Healthy Families New York (HFNY) RCT, Year 7 577 mother/child dyads = 16.36 = 15.28 Mean difference = 1.08 HomVEE calculated = 1.37 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Submitted by user on
Positive value is favorable to the comparison group.
Doing poorly academically
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
1st grade Healthy Families New York (HFNY) RCT, Year 7 577 mother/child dyads = 0.30 = 0.33 Mean difference = -0.03 HomVEE calculated = -0.07 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Submitted by user on
Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
Doing poorly academically - Any of the 3 behaviors that promote learning
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
1st grade Healthy Families New York (HFNY) RCT, Year 7 577 mother/child dyads = 0.15 = 0.16 Mean difference = -0.01 HomVEE calculated = -0.03 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Submitted by user on
Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
Doing poorly academically - Reading or Math
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
1st grade Healthy Families New York (HFNY) RCT, Year 7 577 mother/child dyads = 0.21 = 0.25 Mean difference = -0.04 HomVEE calculated = -0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Submitted by user on
Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
Excelling academically
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
1st grade Healthy Families New York (HFNY) RCT, Year 7 577 mother/child dyads = 0.26 = 0.20 Mean difference = 0.06 HomVEE calculated = 0.19 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Excelling academically - All 3 behaviors that promote learning
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
1st grade Healthy Families New York (HFNY) RCT, Year 7 577 mother/child dyads = 0.13 = 0.08 Mean difference = 0.05 HomVEE calculated = 0.36 Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Excelling academically - Reading and Math
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
1st grade Healthy Families New York (HFNY) RCT, Year 7 577 mother/child dyads = 0.16 = 0.16 Mean difference = 0.00 HomVEE calculated = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
Retained in first grade
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
1st grade Healthy Families New York (HFNY) RCT, Year 7 577 mother/child dyads = 0.04 = 0.07 Mean difference = -0.04 HomVEE calculated = -0.44 Statistically significant, p < 0.05
Submitted by user on
Negative value is favorable to the intervention.
View Revisions