Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH) Meets HHS Criteria

Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2023

Effects shown in research

Child development and school readiness

Findings rated high

Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)
Show findings details
Outcome measure Effect Follow-up timing Sample Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes

Child - Does things to get mother to laugh

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

MECSH vs. comparison, Australia, 2013-2017, full sample

586 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.97 Unadjusted proportion = 0.95 Odds ratio = 2.85 Study reported = 0.63

Statistically significant, p= 0.01

Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Child - Engages in pretend play

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

MECSH vs. comparison, Australia, 2013-2017, full sample

589 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.93 Unadjusted proportion = 0.87 Odds ratio = 1.67 Study reported = 0.31

Not statistically significant, p= 0.05

Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Child - Gets mother to notice things

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

MECSH vs. comparison, Australia, 2013-2017, full sample

590 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.98 Unadjusted proportion = 0.95 Odds ratio = 2.12 Study reported = 0.46

Not statistically significant, p= 0.08

Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Child - Nods to indicate yes

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

MECSH vs. comparison, Australia, 2013-2017, full sample

581 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.86 Unadjusted proportion = 0.81 Odds ratio = 1.22 Study reported = 0.12

Not statistically significant, p= 0.25

Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Child - Puts 2 words together

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

MECSH vs. comparison, Australia, 2013-2017, full sample

587 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.91 Unadjusted proportion = 0.86 Odds ratio = 1.45 Study reported = 0.23

Not statistically significant, p= 0.14

Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

Child - Waves to greet people

FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect

24 months old

MECSH vs. comparison, Australia, 2013-2017, full sample

584 children Unadjusted proportion = 0.88 Unadjusted proportion = 0.85 Odds ratio = 1.15 Study reported = 0.08

Not statistically significant, p= 0.64

Submitted by barbara on

HomVEE calculated the effect size based on the study-reported odds ratio.

View Revisions