Results for families 2-6
Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®-Variants suitable for home visiting
No Triple P intervention is exclusively delivered in the home with families with children from birth through age 5. This profile is based on (1) studies of programs that provided Triple P services in the home to families with children from birth through age 5, and (2) developer input on the Triple P interventions suitable for delivery in the home with families with children from birth through age 5.
Model effectiveness research report last updated: 2019
Effects shown in research
Child development and school readiness
Findings rated high
504
Triple P-Home Visiting/ Child Management Training Component
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deviant Child Behavior -% of intervals - Generalization Setting | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1-3 weeks | Queensland, 1987 | 6 families | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not reported | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Findings rated moderate
Triple P-Home Visiting/ Child Management Training Component
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deviant Child Behavior -% of intervals - Training Setting | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1-3 weeks | Queensland, 1987 | 5 families | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not reported | Not applicable | Not applicable | Results for families 2-6
|
Triple P-Home Visiting/ Child Management Training Component
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disruptive Child Behavior - Generalization Setting | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2-6 weeks | Metropolitan Auckland, 1981 | 5 children | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not reported | Not applicable | Not applicable | Effect of baseline vs. Instructions + Feedback conditions only
|
| Disruptive Child Behavior - Training Setting | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2-6 weeks | Metropolitan Auckland, 1981 | 5 children | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not reported | Not applicable | Not applicable | Effect of baseline vs. Instructions + Feedback conditions only
|
Triple P-Home Visiting/ Child Management Training Component
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deviant Child Behavior - Generalization Setting | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
1-3 weeks | Australia, 1982 | 5 children | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not reported | Not applicable | Not applicable | Effect of baseline vs. Child Management Training conditions only
|
Triple P-Home Visiting/ Child Management Training Component
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deviant Child Behaviors - percent of observed intervals - High Risk Generalization setting | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
2-8 weeks | Queensland 1989 | 3 children | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not reported | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Triple P - Variant Home Visiting: Standard Stepping Stones
Show findings details
| Outcome measure | Effect | Follow-up timing | Sample | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child Behavior Checklist(CBCL)- externalizing | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 months | SSSTP RCT -Study 2 | 39 parents | Adjusted mean = 52.42 | Adjusted mean = 54.80 | Mean difference = -2.38 | HomVEE calculated = -0.21 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.41 |
Negative favors intervention
|
| Child Behavior Checklist(CBCL)- internalizing | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 months | SSSTP RCT -Study 2 | 39 parents | Adjusted mean = 48.16 | Adjusted mean = 51.25 | Mean difference = -3.09 | HomVEE calculated = -0.32 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.27 |
Negative favors intervention
|
| Child Behavior Checklist(CBCL)- total problems | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
5 months | SSSTP RCT -Study 2 | 39 parents | Adjusted mean = 51.42 | Adjusted mean = 54.90 | Mean difference = -3.48 | HomVEE calculated = -0.31 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.37 |
Negative favors intervention
|