Manuscript Detail

Minkovitz, C., Strobino, D., Hughart, N., Scharfstein, D., Guyer, B., & Healthy Steps Evaluation Team (2001). Early effects of the Healthy Steps for Young Children Program. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155(4), 470–479.

Manuscript screening details
Screening decision Screening conclusion HomVEE procedures and standards version
Passes screens Eligible for review Version 1
Study design details
Rating Design Attrition Baseline equivalence Compromised randomization Confounding factors Valid, reliable measure(s)
High Randomized controlled trial Low Not established on race/ethnicity or SES (i.e., maternal education). None None Not assessed in manuscripts reviewed before 2021
Notes:

In 2020, HomVEE updated this review to move the measures of whether the parent gave the baby cereal or water from the Positive Parenting Practice domain to the Child Health domain because ACF determined that HomVEE should place all child feeding outcomes under the Child Health domain. 

Submitted by user on
Study presents unadjusted program and comparison group means (columns 5 and 6). Tests of statistical significance apply to adjusted results in column 7 (means difference or odds ratio).
Submitted by user on
The standard errors in Minkovitz et al. (2001) are adjusted for clustering by site.
Study characteristics
Study participants The sample included 1,987 mothers with children ages 2 to 4 months at assessment. All women enrolled in Healthy Steps within four weeks of the child’s birth. Study enrollment occurred between September 1996 and November 1998. Most mothers had a high school degree (~85%) and one in four also had a college degree. Most study participants were white (~62%) or African American (~24%). The most common maternal age groups were 20-29 (~51%) and over 30 (~33%). Nearly two-thirds of mothers were married.
Setting The six sites—Allentown, PA, Amarillo, TX, Florence, SC, Iowa City, IA, Pittsburgh, PA, and San Diego, CA—were randomly assigned as part of the national evaluation. (There were nine other sites that used quasi-experimental comparisons. These comparisons received a low rating, however. See Study Ratings for details.) Sites were group practices, hospital-based clinics, or pediatric practices in health maintenance organizations.
Intervention services Healthy Steps Specialists provided well-child care, home visits, a child development telephone information line, child development and family health checkups, written materials for parents that emphasize prevention, parent group meetings, and links to community resources. Home visits typically occurred at least once during the first month after birth and a total of six times by the time the children were age 3. Three in four mothers in the intervention group had received a home visit by the two- to four-month follow-up.
Comparison conditions Children in the control group received routine pediatric care but had no exposure to the Healthy Steps Specialist or to Healthy Steps materials.
Subgroups examined This field lists subgroups examined in the manuscript (even if they were not replicated in other samples and not reported on the summary page for this model’s report).
Subgroups are not listed for manuscripts reviewed before 2021.
Funding sources The Commonwealth Fund and local funders.
Author affiliation None of the study authors are developers of this model.
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed status is not listed for manuscripts reviewed before 2021.

Findings that rate moderate or high

Child health
Rating Outcome measure Effect Sample Timing of follow-up Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
High Continuing to breastfeed
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
The 6 RCT national evaluation sites 2-4 mo. 1,987 mothers Mean = 0.56 Mean = 0.54 OR = 1.15 HomVEE calculated = 0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Gave baby cereal
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
The 6 RCT national evaluation sites 2-4 mo. 1,987 mothers Mean = 0.30 Mean = 0.32 OR = 0.88 HomVEE calculated = -0.08 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Gave baby water
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
The 6 RCT national evaluation sites 2-4 mo. 1,987 mothers Mean = 0.38 Mean = 0.41 OR = 0.80 HomVEE calculated = -0.14 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05
Positive parenting practices
Rating Outcome measure Effect Sample Timing of follow-up Sample size Intervention group Comparison group Group difference Effect size Statistical significance Notes
High Car seat in back seat
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
The 6 RCT national evaluation sites 2-4 mo. 1,987 mothers Mean = 0.90 Mean = 0.90 OR = 1.08 HomVEE calculated = 0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Followed at least 2 routines
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
The 6 RCT national evaluation sites 2-4 mo. 1,987 mothers Mean = 0.94 Mean = 0.93 OR = 1.27 HomVEE calculated = 0.14 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Lowered water temperature
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
The 6 RCT national evaluation sites 2-4 mo. 1,987 mothers Mean = 0.31 Mean = 0.33 OR = 0.93 HomVEE calculated = -0.04 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Played with baby daily
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
The 6 RCT national evaluation sites 2-4 mo. 1,987 mothers Mean = 0.93 Mean = 0.93 OR = 1.02 HomVEE calculated = 0.01 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Showed picture books daily
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
The 6 RCT national evaluation sites 2-4 mo. 1,987 mothers Mean = 0.28 Mean = 0.27 OR = 1.08 HomVEE calculated = 0.05 Not statistically significant, p ≥ 0.05
High Used wrong sleep position
FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect
The 6 RCT national evaluation sites 2-4 mo. 1,987 mothers Mean = 0.11 Mean = 0.14 OR = 0.76 HomVEE calculated = -0.17 Statistically significant,
p < 0.05