Necoechea, D. M. (2007). Children at-risk for poor school readiness: The effect of an early intervention home visiting program on children and parents. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68 (6-A), 2311. (Dissertation Abstract: 2007-99230-512)
Model(s) Reviewed:
Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®
| Screening decision | Screening conclusion | HomVEE procedures and standards version |
|---|---|---|
| Passes screens | Eligible for review | Version 1 |
| Rating | Design | Attrition | Baseline equivalence | Compromised randomization | Confounding factors | Valid, reliable measure(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Randomized controlled trial | Low | Established on SES, country of origin, and all outcomes. There was a statistically significant difference between groups on mother’s education, number of children younger than age 5 in the home, and number of adults in the home. The study accounted for these differences. | None | None | Not assessed in manuscripts reviewed before 2021 |
Notes:
This study corrects for multiple comparisons within this domain using the Bonferonni correction. The study uses a critical p-value of 0.01.
| Study participants | Fifty-two mother-child dyads were recruited from state-run preschool sites and community centers in the southeastern region of San Diego between July and September 2005. All mothers were Mexican American, 98% were Spanish speaking, and 92% were immigrants. Most mothers were married, had resided in the United States for an average of 12 years, had limited educational backgrounds, and reported annual incomes of $10,000 - $20,000. Half of the group was randomly selected to receive HIPPY services. One participant from the comparison group was unavailable for post-test assessment and was dropped from the analytic sample. |
|---|---|
| Setting | The study was conducted in San Diego, CA, which is a large urban area. |
| Intervention services | The program group used the Spanish version of the HIPPY curriculum. Although the recommended duration is 30 weeks, and program families received treatment for the full 30 weeks, the outcomes were assessed at 15 weeks. At the 15-week point, program participants had received seven 30- to 60-minute home visits and attended eight 2- to 3-hour group meetings. |
| Comparison conditions | Comparison families did not receive any of the HIPPY services, but were given priority to receive services in the following year in return for their participation in the study. Both groups also received a small stipend. |
| Subgroups examined |
This field lists subgroups examined in the manuscript (even if they were not replicated in other samples and not reported on the summary page for this model’s report). Subgroups are not listed for manuscripts reviewed before 2021. |
| Funding sources | Funder(s) not listed. |
| Author affiliation | None of the study authors are developers of this model. |
| Peer reviewed | Peer reviewed status is not listed for manuscripts reviewed before 2021. |
Findings that rate moderate or high
| Rating | Outcome measure | Effect | Sample | Timing of follow-up | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Developing Skills Checklist | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Full sample | 16 weeks | 51 children | Mean = 5.17 | Mean = 5.28 | Mean difference = -0.11 | Study reported = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.89 |
|
| High | Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test - Revised | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Full sample | 16 weeks | 51 children | Mean = 29.36 | Mean = 25.30 | Mean difference = 4.03 | Study reported = 0.34 | Statistically significant, p < 0.01 |
According to HomVEE calculations, this result is not statistically significant. |
| High | Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - Revised | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Full sample | 16 weeks | 51 children | Adjusted mean = 13.39 | Adjusted mean = 13.59 | Mean difference = -0.20 | Study reported = -0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.88 |
| Rating | Outcome measure | Effect | Sample | Timing of follow-up | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Parent-Home Survey | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Full sample | 16 weeks | 51 mothers | Mean = 70.58 | Mean = 61.64 | Mean difference = 8.94 | Study reported = 0.87 | Statistically significant, p = 0.00 |