Dodge, K. A., Goodman, W. B., Murphy, R. A., O’Donnell, K., Sato, J., & Guptill, S. (2014). Implementation and randomized controlled trial evaluation of universal postnatal nurse home visiting. American Journal of Public Health, 104(S1), S136–S143.
Model(s) Reviewed:
Family Connects
Additional sources:
Dodge, K. A., Goodman, W. B., Murphy, R., O’Donnell, K. T., & Sato, J. M. (2013). Toward population impact from home visiting. Zero to Three, 33(3), 17-23.
Screening decision | Screening conclusion | HomVEE procedures and standards version |
---|---|---|
Passes screens | Eligible for review | Version 1 |
Rating | Design | Attrition | Baseline equivalence | Compromised randomization | Confounding factors | Valid, reliable measure(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moderate | Randomized controlled trial | Low | Established on race; not established on SES; not established on outcome measures assessable at baseline | No | None | Not assessed in manuscripts reviewed before 2021 |
Study participants | Among 4,777 residential births from July 1, 2009, through December 31, 2010, the authors randomly selected one family with a birth on each even day to receive Durham Connects, and one family with a birth on each odd day to be followed as the control group. If those selected did not consent to be studied, the authors replaced them with a randomly selected family from the same birth date with the same race/ethnicity. Among the 664 families enrolled in the study, 531 participated in follow-up data collection. Participating families were approximately one-quarter non-Hispanic white, 40 percent black, one-quarter Hispanic, and 9 percent were another race or ethnicity. Mothers were about 28 years old on average. Control group babies had slightly worse birth outcomes (on average) than control group babies. Eight percent of control group babies had a birth complication, whereas only 4 percent of Durham Connects babies had a birth complication (a statistically significant difference, p less than 0.05). |
---|---|
Setting | Durham, North Carolina |
Intervention services | Durham Connects services consist of a total of four to seven contacts: a contact at the birthing hospital, one to three nurse home visits when infants are age 3 to 12 weeks, one or two nurse contacts with a community service provider, and a telephone or in-person follow-up contact one month later. |
Comparison conditions | Families in the comparison condition could receive other services in their community, but were not eligible to receive Durham Connects services. |
Subgroups examined |
This field lists subgroups examined in the manuscript (even if they were not replicated in other samples and not reported on the summary page for this model’s report). • Maternal childcare use (uses out-of-home care) |
Funding sources | The Duke Endowment, the Pew Center on the States, NIH Grants K05DA15226 and P30DA023026. |
Author affiliation | The authors are affiliated with the Center for Child and Family Policy at Duke University, which sponsors Durham Connects. |
Peer reviewed | Peer reviewed status is not listed for manuscripts reviewed before 2021. |
Study Registration:
Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01406184
Findings that rate moderate or high
Rating | Outcome measure | Effect | Sample | Timing of follow-up | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moderate | Did not have emergency medical care episodes (hospital records), proportion | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.74 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.72 | Mean difference = 0.02 | HomVEE calculated = 0.06 | Not statistically significant, p=0.50 | |
Moderate | Did not have emergency medical care episodes (parent report) proportion | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.50 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.51 | Mean difference = -0.01 | HomVEE calculated = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p=0.70 | |
Moderate | Most recent well-baby visit within past month | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.70 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.67 | OR = 1.12 | HomVEE calculated = 0.07 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.54 |
|
Moderate | No. of emergency department visits (hospital records) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted mean = 0.32 | Unadjusted mean = 0.39 | Mean difference = 0.14 | HomVEE calculated = -0.09 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.36 |
|
Moderate | No. of emergency medical visits (parent report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted mean = 0.82 | Unadjusted mean = 0.98 | Mean difference = 0.17 | HomVEE calculated = -0.12 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.07 |
|
Moderate | No. of overnights in hospital (parent report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted mean = 0.08 | Unadjusted mean = 0.40 | Mean difference = 1.60 | Study reported = 0.20 | Statistically significant, p<0.001 | |
Moderate | No. of total emergency medical care episodes (hospital records) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted mean = 0.43 | Unadjusted mean = 1.05 | Mean difference = 0.91 | Study reported = 0.26 | Statistically significant, p<0.001 | |
Moderate | No. of total emergency medical care episodes (parent report) | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted mean = 0.89 | Unadjusted mean = 1.37 | Mean difference = 0.40 | Study reported = 0.21 | Statistically significant, p<0.001 | |
Moderate | Three or more emergency medical care episodes (hospital records), proportion | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.03 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.09 | Mean difference = -0.05 | HomVEE calculated = -0.65 | Statistically significant, p<0.01 | |
Moderate | Three or more emergency medical care episodes (parent report), proportion | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.09 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.13 | Mean difference = -0.04 | HomVEE calculated = -0.26 | Statistically significant, p<0.01 | |
Moderate | Two or more emergency medical care episodes (hospital records), proportion | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.10 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.15 | Mean difference = -0.06 | HomVEE calculated = -0.31 | Statistically significant, p<0.01 | |
Moderate | Two or more emergency medical care episodes (parent report), proportion | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.21 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.25 | Mean difference = -0.04 | HomVEE calculated = -0.13 | Not statistically significant, p=0.13 |
Rating | Outcome measure | Effect | Sample | Timing of follow-up | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moderate | No. of community connections | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted mean = 5.02 | Unadjusted mean = 4.31 | Mean difference = 0.86 | Study reported = 0.28 | Statistically significant, p<0.001 |
Rating | Outcome measure | Effect | Sample | Timing of follow-up | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moderate | Mother possible anxiety disorder | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.21 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.30 | OR = 0.65 | HomVEE calculated = -0.27 | Statistically significant, p<0.05 | |
Moderate | Mother possible clinical depression disorder | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.08 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.12 | OR = 0.69 | HomVEE calculated = -0.29 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.25 |
|
Moderate | Mother possible substance use problems | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 530 families | Unadjusted proportion = 0.05 | Unadjusted proportion = 0.06 | OR = 0.80 | HomVEE calculated = -0.19 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.58 |
Rating | Outcome measure | Effect | Sample | Timing of follow-up | Sample size | Intervention group | Comparison group | Group difference | Effect size | Statistical significance | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moderate | Father–infant relationship quality | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 524 families | Unadjusted mean = 2.09 | Unadjusted mean = 1.92 | Mean difference = 0.11 | HomVEE calculated = 0.21 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.08 |
|
Moderate | Mother knowledge of infant development | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted mean = 0.75 | Unadjusted mean = 0.77 | Mean difference = 0.02 | HomVEE calculated = -0.11 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.10 |
|
Moderate | Mother negative parenting behaviors | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted mean = 0.32 | Unadjusted mean = 0.33 | Mean difference = 0.02 | HomVEE calculated = -0.03 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.59 |
|
Moderate | Mother positive parenting behaviors | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted mean = 4.12 | Unadjusted mean = 4.01 | Mean difference = 0.10 | Study reported = 0.25 | Statistically significant, p<0.01 | |
Moderate | Mother sense of parenting competence | FavorableUnfavorable or ambiguousNo Effect |
Interviewed subsample, 7/2009-12/2010 births | Infant Age 6 months | 531 families | Unadjusted mean = 4.62 | Unadjusted mean = 4.63 | Mean difference = 0.01 | HomVEE calculated = -0.02 | Not statistically significant, p = 0.83 |