Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 601 - 610 of 680, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Terpstra, L., van Dijke, A., & Netherlands Inst of Care and Welfare. (1999). Home-Start between childhood and maturity: A programme evaluation. Utrecht: NIZW Uitgeverij.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Thompson, R. S., Lawrence, D. M., Huebner, C. E., & Johnston, B. D. (2004). Expanding developmental and behavioral services for newborns in primary care: Implications of the findings. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26(4), 367–371.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Thorland, W., & Currie, D. (2017). Status of birth outcomes in clients of the Nurse-Family Partnership. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 21(5), 995–1001.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Thorland, W., Currie, D., Wiegand, E., Walsh, J., & Mader, N. (2017). Status of breastfeeding and child immunization outcomes in clients of the Nurse-Family Partnership. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 21(3), 439–445.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Thorpe, D., Silver, J., Perrone, L., DeSantis, N., Dash, A., Rodriguez, M., ... & Bernard, K. (2022). Ecological predictors of parental beliefs about infant crying in a randomized clinical trial of ABC.  Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 51(5), 780-795. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2021.1916939

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant)

View Manuscript
High rating
This manuscript received a rating of high because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Tiwari, A., Whitaker, D., & Self-Brown, S. (2021). Comparing fidelity monitoring methods in an evidence-based parenting intervention. Journal of Children's Services, 16(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-01-2020-0005

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Törmänen, M., Schaub, S., Ramseier, E., Koch, C., Kalkusch, I., Rodcharoen, P., ... & Klaver, P. (2024). How do psychosocial stress of the family and early-term birth affect the development of children‘s executive functions? Using Baileys Scale III as a measurement for executive functions in children between 0 and 3 years. ESS Open Archive eprints, 186, 18637657.

Model(s) Reviewed: Parents as Teachers (PAT)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Toth, S. L., & Gravener, J. (2012). Bridging research and practice: Relational interventions for maltreated children. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 17(3), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00638.x

Model(s) Reviewed: Building Healthy Children (BHC)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Tracey, L., Torgerson, C., Dysart, E., Fairhurst, C., Gridley, N. & Welch, C. (2022). Efficacy trial of the ParentChild+ programme (Evaluation report). Education Endowment Foundation. https://d2tic4wvo1iusb.cloudfront.net/documents/projects/Final-ParentChild.pdf?v=1687443633

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Tsivos, Z. L., Calam, R., Sanders, M. R., & Wittkowski, A. (2015). A pilot randomised controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Baby Triple P Positive Parenting Programme in mothers with postnatal depression. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20(4), 532–554.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download XLSX