Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 151 - 160 of 388, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Hoye, J. R., Cheishvili, D., Yarger, H. A., Roth, T. L., Szyf, M., & Dozier, M. (2019). Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up alters DNA methylation in maltreated children: Preliminary intervention effects from a randomized clinical trial. Developmental Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579419001421

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up (ABC) -Infant

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: No eligible outcomes
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hoye, J. R., & Dozier, M. (2018). Implementing Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up with birth parents: Rationale and case example. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(8), 1300–1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22641

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up (ABC) -Infant

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Imrisek, S. D., Castaño, K., & Bernard, K. (2018). Developing self-regulation in a dysregulating world: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up for a toddler in foster care. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(8), 1308–1318. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22642

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up (ABC) -Infant

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ionutiu, R. D. (2016). The effectiveness of a positive parenting program-results of a preliminary study in a Romanian sample. Cognitie, Creier, Comportament, 20(3).

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Iskander, J. M., Rakestraw, H. M., Morris, A. T., Wildman, B. G., & Duby, J. C. (2018). Group Triple P and child unintentional injury risk: A pilot study. Children’s Health Care, 47(4), 452–466.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Jones, S., Calam, R., Sanders, M., Diggle, P. J., Dempsey, R., & Sadhnani, V. (2014). A pilot web based positive parenting intervention to help bipolar parents to improve perceived parenting skills and child outcomes. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 42(3), 283–296.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Kamp-Becker, I., Becker, K., & Petermann, U. (2014). Elternarbeit und elterntraining. Kindheit und Entwicklung.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Kamp-Becker, I., Becker, K., & Petermann, U. (2015). Elternarbeit und elterntraining. Kindheit und Entwicklung: Zeitschrift fur Klinische Kinderpsychologie, 24(1), 1–5.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Keown, L. J., Sanders, M. R., Franke, N., & Shepherd, M. (2018). Te Whānau Pou Toru: a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a culturally adapted low-intensity variant of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program for indigenous Māori families in New Zealand. Prevention Science, 19(7) 954–965.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Kirby, J. N., & Sanders, M. R. (2013). Using a behavioural family intervention to produce a three-generational benefit on family outcomes: A case report. Behaviour Change, 30(4), 249-261.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download