Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 11 - 20 of 41, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Barth, R. P. (1989). Evaluation of a task-centered child abuse prevention program. Children and Youth Services Review, 11(2), 117-131.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barth, R. P. (1991). An experimental evaluation of in-home child abuse prevention services. Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 15(4), 363-75.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barth, R. P., Ash, J. R., & Hacking, S. (1986). Identifying, screening and engaging high-risk clients in private nonprofit child-abuse prevention programs. Child Abuse and Neglect, 10(1), 99-109.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barth, R. P., Hacking, S., & Ash, J. R. (1988). Preventing child abuse: An experimental evaluation of the Child Parent Enrichment Project. Journal of Primary Prevention, 8(4), 201-217.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Because childhood can’t wait: Home-Start impact report. (2019). Home-Start UK.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Dekovic, M., Asscher, J. J., Hermanns, J., Reitz, E., Prinzie, P., & van den Akker, A. L. (2010). Tracing changes in families who participated in the Home-Start parenting program: Parental sense of competence as mechanism of change. Prevention Science, 11, 263-274.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Gentry, S. V., Powers, E. F. J., Azim, N., & Maidrag, M. (2018). Effectiveness of a voluntary family befriending service: A mixed methods evaluation using the Donabedian model. Public Health, 160, 87–93.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Gibbons, J., & Thorpe, S. (1989). Can voluntary support projects help vulnerable families? The work of home-start. British Journal of Social Work, 19(3), 189-202.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Outside search years
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Hann, M. (2017). Engaging fathers: The next challenge for Home-Start. Journal of Health Visiting, 5(7), 334–337.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Harrison, M. (1983). The 'home-start' scheme. Midwife, Health Visitor & Community Nurse, 19(8), 328-330.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download