Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 12, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Barth, R. P. (1989). Evaluation of a task-centered child abuse prevention program. Children and Youth Services Review, 11(2), 117-131.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barth, R. P. (1991). An experimental evaluation of in-home child abuse prevention services. Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 15(4), 363-75.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barth, R. P., Ash, J. R., & Hacking, S. (1986). Identifying, screening and engaging high-risk clients in private nonprofit child-abuse prevention programs. Child Abuse and Neglect, 10(1), 99-109.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barth, R. P., Hacking, S., & Ash, J. R. (1988). Preventing child abuse: An experimental evaluation of the Child Parent Enrichment Project. Journal of Primary Prevention, 8(4), 201-217.

Model(s) Reviewed: Child Parent Enrichment Project (CPEP)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Bulman, A. (2008). Nursing mothers. American Journal of Nursing, 108(8), 86–87.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurses for Newborns®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Jonson-Reid, M., & Stahlschmidt, M.J. (2010). Child abuse prevention final report. Report to the Missouri Department of Social Services Children's Division & Nurses for Newborns Foundation. St. Louis, MO: Washington University in St. Louis, George Warren Brown School of Social Work.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurses for Newborns®

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lanier, P. (2014). Child maltreatment prevention and health promotion: Examining the effectiveness of a nurse home-visiting program. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 74(8-A(E)).

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurses for Newborns®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Not the most recent and complete version available
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lanier, P., Child Maltreatment Prevention and Health Promotion: Examining the Effectiveness of a Nurse Home-Visiting Program (2013). Available from the Electronic Theses and Dissertations database. (Paper 1144)

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurses for Newborns®

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lanier, P., & Jonson-Reid, M. Comparing primiparous and multiparous mothers in a nurse home visiting prevention program. Birth, 41(4), 344–352.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurses for Newborns®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible Study Design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Newborn RNs find niche: Teaching how to parent. (1990). American Journal of Nursing, 90(11), 80.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurses for Newborns®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download