Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 321 - 330 of 372, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

St. Pierre, R., Swartz, J., Gamse, B., Murray, S., Deck, D., & Nickel, P. (1995). National evaluation of the Even Start Family Literacy program: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary, Planning and Evaluation Service.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

St. Pierre, R., Swartz, J., Murray, S., & Deck, D. (1996). Improving family literacy: Findings from the national Even Start evaluation. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Stace, D. (2018). Walking the line between two practices: Accepting invitations to use narrative practices when facilitating group Triple P. International Journal of Narrative Therapy & Community Work, 2, 12.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Stallman, H. M., & Sanders, M. R. (2007). “Family transitions Triple P”: The theoretical basis and development of a program for parents going through divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 47(3), 133-153.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Stallman, H., & Sanders, M. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of family transitions Triple P: A group-administered parenting program to minimize the adverse effects of parental divorce on children. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 55(1), 33-48.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Steil, R., Bohus, M., Heinrichs, N., Rosner, R., & Schäfer, I. (2015). Innovative Behandlungsstrategien für die Folgen von sexuellem und physischem Missbrauch in der Kindheit [Innovative treatment strategies for sequels to sexual and physical abuse in childhood]. Trauma & Gewalt, 9(2), 148–159.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Sumargi, A., Sofronoff, K., & Morawska, A. (2014). Evaluation of a brief format of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: a pilot study with Indonesian parents residing in Australia. Behaviour Change, 31(2), 144–158.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Susan Dahinten, V., Arim, R. G. Guèvremont, A., & Kohen, D. E. (2016). Using administrative data to examine a population-based parenting intervention. In Merrick, J. (Ed.), Public Health: Some International Aspects (pp. 69–81). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Tao, F. &, Arriola, C. (1997). Special analysis of migrant education Even Start data. Even Start information system. Arlington, VA: Fu Associates, Ltd.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program; Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Tao, F., & Arriola, C. (1997). Special analysis of tribal Even Start projects data. Even Start information system. Arlington, VA: Fu Associated, Ltd.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download