Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 11 - 20 of 140, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Li, J. (2016). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home: 2012-2014. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Li, J. (2016). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home: Deliverable G. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Chang, H., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). Proactive parenting and children's effortful control: Mediating role of language and indirect intervention effects. Social Development, 24(1), 206-223.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Chang, H., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Gardner, F., & Wilson, M. N. (2014). Direct and indirect effects of the family check-up on self-regulation from toddlerhood to early school-age. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(7), 1117–1128.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Chang, H., Shaw, D. S., Shelleby, E. C., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2016). The long-term effectiveness of the family check-up on peer preference: Parent-child interaction and child effortful control as sequential mediators. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. Advance online publication.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
High rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Chang, H., Shaw, D. S., Shelleby, E. C., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2017). The long–term effectiveness of the Family Check–Up on peer preference: Parent–child interaction and child effortful control as sequential mediators. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(4), 705–717.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Chiapa, A., Smith, J. D., Kim, H., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2015). The trajectory of fidelity in a multiyear trial of the family check-up predicts change in child problem behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(5), 1006.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Cicchetti, D., Fosco, G. M., Van Ryzin, M., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2016). Putting theory to the test: Examining family context, caregiver motivation, and conflict in the family check-up model—corrigendum. Development & Psychopathology, 28(4 Pt. 2), 1565.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download