Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 81 - 90 of 180, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Kirk, R. S., & Griffith, D. P. (2008). Impact of intensive family preservation services on disproportionality of out-of-home placement of children of color in one state’s child welfare system. Child Welfare: Journal of Policy, Practice, and Program, 87(5), 87–105.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Kirk, R. S., Reed-Ashcraft, K., & Pecora, P. J. (2002). Implementing intensive family preservation services: A case of infidelity. Family Preservation Journal, 6(2), 59-81.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Krug, C. M. W., Hails, K. A., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., & Wilson, M. N. (2020). Child birth order as a moderator of intervention effectiveness for the early childhood version of the Family Check–Up. Prevention Science, 21,456–466.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kuklinski, M. R., Crowley, D. M., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., Pelham, W. E., & Shaw, D. S. (2020). Supporting strategic investment in social programs: A cost analysis of the Family Check–Up. Prevention Science, 21(2), 256–267.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Kuo, S. I., Salvatore, J. E., Aliev, F., Ha, T., Dishion, T. J., & Dick, D. M. (2019). The Family Check–Up intervention moderates polygenic influences on long–term alcohol outcomes: Results from a randomized intervention trial. Prevention Science, 20(7), 975–985.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

O’Leary, C. C. (2001). The early childhood family check-up: A brief intervention for at-risk families with preschool-aged children. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 62(6-B), 2992.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Leijten, P., Shaw, D. S., Gardner, F., Wilson, M. N., Matthys, W., & Dishion, T. J. (2015). Erratum to: The family check-up and service use in high-risk families of young children: A prevention strategy with a bridge to community-based treatment. Prevention Science, 16(3), 407.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Leijten, P., Shaw, D. S., Gardner, F., Wilson, M. N., Matthys, W., & Dishion, T. J. (2015). The family check-up and service use in high-risk families of young children: A prevention strategy with a bridge to community-based treatment. Prevention Science, 16(3), 397–406.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lemery–Chalfant, K., Clifford, S., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., & Wilson, M. N. (2018). Genetic moderation of the effects of the Family Check–Up intervention on children’s internalizing symptoms: A longitudinal study with a racially/ethnically diverse sample. Development and Psychopathology, 30(5), 1729–1747.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Lewis, R. E. (1990). Service-related correlates of treatment success in intensive family preservation services for child welfare. (University of Utah; 0240 Advisor: Chairman: Peter J. Pecora). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (03A), 248-1003. (AAG9025368)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download XLSX