Research Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, read about our Systematic Review Handbook of Procedures and Evidence Standards.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Displaying 1 - 10 of 44

Walton, E., & Dodini, A. C. (1999). Intensive in-home family-based services: Reactions from consumers and providers. Family Preservation Journal, 4(2), 39–51.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Van Puyenbroeck, H., Loots, G., Grietens, H., Jacquet, W., Vanderfaeillie, J., & Escudero, V. (2009). Intensive family preservation services in Flanders: An outcome study. Child & Family Social Work, 14(2), 222–232.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Lewis, R. E. (1990). Service-related correlates of treatment success in intensive family preservation services for child welfare. (University of Utah; 0240 Advisor: Chairman: Peter J. Pecora). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (03A), 248-1003. (AAG9025368)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Kinney, J., & Dittmar, K. (1995). HomeBuilders: Helping families help themselves. In I. M. Schwartz & P. AuClaire (Eds.), Home-based services for troubled children (pp. 29–54). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Hawkins, J. D., & Catalano, R. F. (1990). Intensive family preservation services: Broadening the vision for prevention. In J. K. Whittaker, J. Kinney, E. M. Tracy, & C. Booth (Eds.), Reaching high-risk families: Intensive family preservation in human services (pp. 179–192). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Barth, R. (1990). Theories guiding home-based intensive family preservation services. In J. K. Whittaker, J. Kinney, E. M. Tracey, & C. Booth (Eds.), Reaching high-risk families: Intensive family preservation in human services (pp. 89-112). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Kinney, J., Haapala, D., Booth, C., & Leavitt, S. (1990). The HomeBuilders model. In J. K. Whittaker, J. Kinney, E. M. Tracy, & C. Booth (Eds.), Reaching high-risk families: Intensive family preservation in human services (pp. 31–64). New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Walters, B. (2006). Evaluating the efficacy of Michigan's Families First program. (Boston College; 0016 Advisor: Adviser Betty Blythe). Dissertation Abstracts International, 67 (06A), 198-2324. (AAI3221282)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Rating: Does not pass screens
Burns, M. K. (2002). Cementing the cracks: A qualitative study of how parents interpret their experiences as recipients of family preservation services. (Pennsylvania State University; 0176 Advisor: Daniele Flannery). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63 (05A), 267-1666. (AAI3051628)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Rating: Does not pass screens

Kauffman, F. G. (2002). Preventing child abuse and neglect in Arizona: Perceptions of the HomeBuilders’ model. (Arizona State University; 0010). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63 (04A), 142-1558. (AAI3045650)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Rating: Not applicable (NA) - implementation study