Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 11 - 20 of 52, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Barnes, J., Senior, R., & MacPherson, K. (2009). The utility of volunteer home-visiting support to prevent maternal depression in the first year of life. Child: Care, Health & Development, 35(6), 807-816.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Because childhood can’t wait: Home-Start impact report. (2019). Home-Start UK.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Belliston, L. M. (1998). Program evaluation of Family Connections II, a family enrichment program. (Utah State University; 0241 Advisor: Major Professor: Thomas R. Lee). Masters Abstracts International, 37 (01), 211–142. (AAG1390988)

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connections (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Chamberlain,P (1995). Family Connections – Treatment foster-care for adolescents. Eugene, OR: Northwest Media

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connections (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Dekovic, M., Asscher, J. J., Hermanns, J., Reitz, E., Prinzie, P., & van den Akker, A. L. (2010). Tracing changes in families who participated in the Home-Start parenting program: Parental sense of competence as mechanism of change. Prevention Science, 11, 263-274.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

DePanfilis, D. (2002). Helping families prevent neglect - final report. (Grant No. 90CA1580). Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland School of Social Work.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connections (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study is not the most recent or complete version available.
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

DePanfilis, D. (2009). Using prevention science to reduce the risk of child neglect. Children Australia, 34(1), 40–44.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connections (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study; Ineligbile study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

DePanfilis, D., & Dubowitz, H. (2005). Family Connections: A program for preventing child neglect. Child Maltreatment, 10, 108–123.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connections (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study is not the most recent or complete version available.
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

DePanfilis, D., Dubowitz, H., & Kunz, J. (2008).  Assessing the cost-effectiveness of Family Connections. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 335–351.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connections (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Gentry, S. V., Powers, E. F. J., Azim, N., & Maidrag, M. (2018). Effectiveness of a voluntary family befriending service: A mixed methods evaluation using the Donabedian model. Public Health, 160, 87–93.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2
Download