Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 71 - 80 of 325, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Duncombe, M. E., Havighurst, S. S., Kehoe, C. E., Holland, K. A., Frankling, E. J., & Stargatt, R. (2016). Comparing an emotion-and a behavior-focused parenting program as part of a multsystemic intervention for child conduct problems. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45(3), 320–334.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Ehrensaft, M. K., Knous-Westfall, H. M., & Alonso, T. L. (2016). Web-based prevention of parenting difficulties in young, urban mothers enrolled in post-secondary education. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 37(6), 527–542.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Einfeld, S. L., Stancliffe, R. J., Gray, K. M., Sofronoff, K., Rice, L., Emerson, E., & Yasamy, M. T. (2012). Interventions provided by parents for children with intellectual disabilities in low and middle income countries. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25(2), 135-142.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Errázuriz, P., Cerfogli, C., Moreno, G., & Soto, G. (2016). Perception of Chilean parents on the triple P Program for improving parenting practices. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(11), 3440–3449.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Esehaghzadeh, F., Reyhani, T., Moharari, F., & Mazlom, S. R. (2018). Effect of training Positive Parenting Program on mother-child relationship among mothers of children with externalizing disorders. Evidence Based Care, 8(2), 58–66.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Evans, G. A. (2014). Parenting skills training as an intervention for tic disorders (Doctoral dissertation, the University of Manchester). Retrieved from https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/54554997/FULL_TEXT.P…

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Evans, T., Boyd, R. N., Colditz, P., Sanders, M., & Whittingham, K. (2017). Baby triple p for parents of a very preterm infant: A case study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(2), 633–642.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Evans, T., Boyd, R. N., Colditz, P., Sanders, M., & Whittingham, K. (2017). Mother-very preterm infant relationship quality: RCT of baby Triple P. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(1), 284–295.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fawley-King, K., Trask, E., E. Calderón, N., A. Aarons, G., & F. Garland, A. (2014). Implementation of an evidence-based parenting programme with a Latina population: Feasibility and preliminary outcomes. Journal of Children's Services, 9(4), 295–306.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Feely, M., Seay, K. D., Lanier, P., Auslander, W., & Kohl, P. L. (2018). Measuring fidelity in research studies: A field guide to developing a comprehensive fidelity measurement system. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 35(2), 139–152.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download