Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 7 of 7, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Barnes, J., MacPherson, K., & Senior, R. (2006). The impact on parenting and the home environment of early support to mothers with new babies. Journal of Children's Services, 1(4), 4-20.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with compromised random assignment that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Dodge, K. A., Goodman, W. B., Bai, Y., O’Donnell, K., & Murphy, R. A. (2019). Effect of a community agency-administered nurse home visitation program on program use and maternal and infant health outcomes: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 2(11), Article e1914522.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connects

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Goodman, W. B., Dodge, K. A., Bai, Y., Murphy, R. A., & O’Donnell, K. (2022). Evaluation of a Family Connects dissemination to four high-poverty rural counties. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 1-10.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connects

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

McAuley, C., Knapp, M., Beecham, J., McCurry, N., & Sleed, M. (2004). Young families under stress: Outcomes and costs of Home-Start support. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Mersky, J. P., Choi, C., & Lee, C. P. (2022). Quasinatural experiment of postnatal home visiting: An independent impact study of Family Connects. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 63(5), 783–789.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connects

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

van Aar, J. V., Asscher, J. J., Zijlstra, B. J. H., Deković, M., & Hoffenaar, P. J. (2015). Changes in parenting and child behavior after the Home-Start family support program: A 10 year follow-up. [Study 1: Home-Start versus comparison group]. Children & Youth Services Review, 53, 166-175.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

van Aar, J. V., Asscher, J. J., Zijlstra, B. J. H., Deković, M., & Hoffenaar, P. J. (2015). Changes in parenting and child behavior after the Home-Start family support program: A 10 year follow-up. [Study 2: Home-Start versus community contrast]. Children & Youth Services Review, 53, 166-175. 

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1
Download