Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 17, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Arkansas Center for Health Improvement and UAMS Department of Family and Preventive Medicine. (2019). Home-visiting support for low-birth-weight preterm infants: evaluation findings from the Following Baby Back Home intervention. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Little Rock, AR.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Caron, E., Kipp, E. C., Costello, A. H., Bernard, K., Schein, S. S., Roben, C. K. P., & Dozier, M. (2022). Parent coaching fidelity trajectories of in-person and telehealth sessions during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7(3), 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2021.1996300

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant), Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Casey, P.H., Irby, C., Withers, S., Dorsey, S., Li, J., & Rettiganti, M. (2017). Home visiting and the health of preterm infants. Clinical Pediatrics, 56(9), 828-837.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Gossett, J. (2017). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Li, J. (2016). Evaluation of UAMS/MIECHV Following Baby Back Home: 2012-2014. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Casey, P., Rettiganti, M., & Li, J. (2016). Evaluation of UAMS/ANGELS Following Baby Back Home: Deliverable G. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Following Baby Back Home (FBBH)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - additional source
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Gaudreau, C., Delgado, A., Confair-Jones, R., Flambaum, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Raby, K. L., Dozier, M., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2024). The unanticipated side effects of an attachment intervention: Parents ask higher quality questions. Developmental Psychology, 60(3), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001707

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Labella, M. H., Raby, K. L., Bourne, S. V., Trahan, A. C., Katz, D., & Dozier, M. (2024). Is Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up effective for parents with insecure attachment states of mind? Child Development, 95(2), 648-655. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14002

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Infant (ABC-Infant), Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible comparison

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3

Liming, K. W., Grube, W., Lloyd Sieger, M. H., Brook, J., Berryhill, E., Akin, B. A., & Mendenhall, A. (2024). Child Welfare Outcomes After Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up Intervention Participation: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Child Maltreatment, 30(2), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595241265968 [Study 3: ABC – Early Childhood contrast].
 

Model(s) Reviewed: Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-Up–Early Childhood (ABC-Early Childhood)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.3
Download