Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 71 - 79 of 79, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Walton, E. (2001). Combining abuse and neglect investigations with intensive family preservation services: An innovative approach to protecting children. Research on Social Work Practice, 11(6), 627-644.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Walton, E., & Dodini, A. C. (1999). Intensive in-home family-based services: Reactions from consumers and providers. Family Preservation Journal, 4(2), 39–51.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Wells, K. (1994). A reorientation to knowledge development in family preservation services: A proposal. Child Welfare, 73(5), 475-488.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design; Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Wells, K., & Wittington, D. Child and family functioning after intensive family preservation services. Social Service Review, 67(1), 55-83.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design; Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Westat, Chapin Hall Center for Children, & James Bell Associates (2002). Evaluation of family preservation and reunification programs: Final report. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Whittaker, J. K., Tracy, E. M., Kinney, J., & Booth, C.  (1990). Reaching high-risk families: Intensive family preservation in human services. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Wilson, G. J. H. (2008). Comparison of the use of the Healthy Steps for Young Children model at the affiliate sites in two diverse Chicago communities. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 69(6B).

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zamora, I. (2007). The Healthy Steps program: Helping families grow. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 68(5B).

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Zuckerman, B., Kaplan-Sanoff, M., Augustyn, M., Barth, M. C., & Parker, S. (2004). Healthy Steps: A case study of innovation in pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 114(3), 820–826. doi:10.1542/peds.2003-0999-L

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Steps (National Evaluation 1996 Protocol)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download XLSX