Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 61 - 70 of 81, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Staudt, M., & Drake, B. (2002). Intensive family preservation services: Where's the crisis?24(9-10), 777-795.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Steinbock, J. A. (1992). Keeping families together: The Homebuilders model. The Jewish Social Work Forum, 28, 87-90.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Strong families make strong communities: Home-Start’s social impact report. (2017). Home-Start UK.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Sugarman, P., & Chudasama, K. (2022). Volunteer-led family intervention: a UK national programme. [Unpublished manuscript submitted to HomVEE].

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Terpstra, L., van Dijke, A., & Netherlands Inst of Care and Welfare. (1999). Home-Start between childhood and maturity: A programme evaluation. Utrecht: NIZW Uitgeverij.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

van Aar, J. V., Asscher, J. J., Zijlstra, B. J. H., Deković, M., & Hoffenaar, P. J. (2015). Changes in parenting and child behavior after the Home-Start family support program: A 10 year follow-up. [Study 1: Home-Start versus comparison group]. Children & Youth Services Review, 53, 166-175.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

van Aar, J. V., Asscher, J. J., Zijlstra, B. J. H., Deković, M., & Hoffenaar, P. J. (2015). Changes in parenting and child behavior after the Home-Start family support program: A 10 year follow-up. [Study 2: Home-Start versus community contrast]. Children & Youth Services Review, 53, 166-175. 

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Low rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

van der Waerden, J. (2018). Zorgvuldige intake belangrijk bij home-start. Zorg+ Welzijn, 24, 18–19.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Manuscript is not written in English
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Van Puyenbroeck, H., Loots, G., Grietens, H., Jacquet, W., Vanderfaeillie, J., & Escudero, V. (2009). Intensive family preservation services in Flanders: An outcome study. Child & Family Social Work, 14(2), 222–232.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Walters, B. (2006). Evaluating the efficacy of Michigan's Families First program. (Boston College; 0016 Advisor: Adviser Betty Blythe). Dissertation Abstracts International, 67 (06A), 198-2324. (AAI3221282)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download