Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 141 - 150 of 347, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Lewis, J. (2011). Parenting programmes in England: Policy development and implementation issues, 2005–2010. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 33(2), 107-121.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, E. M., Feely, M., Seay, K. D., Fedoravicis, N., & Kohl, P. L. (2016). Child welfare involved parents and Pathways Triple P: perceptions of program acceptability and appropriateness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(12), 3760–3770.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, E. M., Feely, M., Seay, K. D., Fedoravicis, N., & Kohl, P. L. (2016). Child welfare involved parents and Pathways Triple P: Perceptions of program acceptability and appropriateness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(12), 3760–3770.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Long-term outcomes from a positive parenting program. (2010). Brown University Child & Adolescent Behavior Letter, 26(8), 2-2.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Love, S. M., Sanders, M. R., Turner, K. M., Maurange, M., Knott, T., Prinz, R., . . . Ainsworth, A. T. (2016). Social media and gamification: Engaging vulnerable parents in an online evidence-based parenting program. Child Abuse & Neglect, 53, 95–107.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Macdonald, W. (2014). The role of positive emotions within parenting interventions as part of therapeutic change (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester). Retrieved from https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.603175

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

MacPherson, K., Barnes, J., Nichols, M., & Dixon, S. (2010). Volunteer support for mothers with new babies: Perceptions of need and support received. Children & Society, 24(3), 175-187. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00227.x

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Making a difference for children and families: Home-Start social impact report 2014. (2015). Home-Start UK.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Marryat, L., Thompson, L., & Wilson, P. (2017). No evidence of whole population mental health impact of the Triple P parenting programme: Findings from a routine dataset. BMC Pediatrics, 17(1), 40.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 18(3), 274-283.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download