Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 11 - 20 of 87, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Cowley, S., Kemp, L., Day, C., & Appleton, J. (Mar 2012). Research and the organisation of complex provision: Conceptualising health visiting services and early years programmes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 17(2), 108–124.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Egan, K. A., Xuan, Z., & Silverstein, M. (2021). Realizing the potential of nurse home visiting. Pediatrics, 147(2).

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Not about a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Evans, M., Boothroyd, R., & Armstrong, M. (1997). Development and implementation of an experimental study of the effectiveness of intensive in-home crisis services for children and their families. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 5(2), 93–105.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Evans, M. E., Boothroyd, R. A., Armstrong, M. I., Greenbaum, P. E., Crown, E. C., & Kuppinger, A. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effectiveness of intensive in-home crisis services for children and their families: Program outcomes. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 11(2), 92.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fagan, C. P. B. (1992). Keeping families together: The homebuilders model. Child Welfare, 71(3), 283-285.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Floyd, R. M., & Taylor, J. (1991). Keeping families together: The homebuilders model. Community Alternatives, 3(2), 145-147.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Forsythe, P. (1992). Homebuilders and family preservation. Children and Youth Services Review, 14(1-2), 37-47.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fraser, M., & Haapla, D. (1987). Home-based family treatment:  A quantitative-qualitative assessment. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 12(1), 1-23.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fraser, M., Pecora, P. J., & Haapla, D. A. (1991). Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family peservation services. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design; Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Fraser, M. W., Pecora, P. J., Popuang, C., & Haapala, D. A. (1992). Event history analysis: A proportional hazards perspective on modeling outcomes in intensive family preservation services. Journal of Social Service Research, 16(1-2), 123-158.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download