Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 31 - 40 of 54, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Kirk, R. S., Reed-Ashcraft, K., & Pecora, P. J. (2002). Implementing intensive family preservation services: A case of infidelity. Family Preservation Journal, 6(2), 59-81.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, R. E. (1990). Service-related correlates of treatment success in intensive family preservation services for child welfare. (University of Utah; 0240 Advisor: Chairman: Peter J. Pecora). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (03A), 248-1003. (AAG9025368)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, R. E. (1994). Application and adaptation of intensive family preservation services to use for  the reunification of foster-children with their biological parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 16(5-6), 339-361.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Lewis, R. E. (1995). Institutionalizing intensive family preservation services: A strategy for creating staffing standards based on projections of at-risk children from referral sources. Family Preservation Journal, 1(1) 87-109.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Maher, E. J., Marcynyszyn, L. A., Corwin, T. W., & Hodnett, R. Dosage matters: The relationship between participation in the nurturing parenting program for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers and subsequent child maltreatment. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program; Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Martus, J. E. (1993). Benefits of a nurturing program: Perceptions of adolescent mothers. (San Jose State University; 6265 Advisor: Chair: Susan Murphy). Masters Abstracts International, 31 (04), 92-1744. (AAG1353038)

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Matthew, R. F., Wang, M. Q., Bellamy, N., & Copeland, E. (2005). Test of efficacy of model family strengthening programs. American Journal of Health Studies, 20(3), 164–170.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Morris, E., Suarez, L., & Reid, J. C. (1997). Behavioral outcomes of home-based services for children and adolescents with serious emotional disorders. Family Preservation Journal, 2(2), 21-32.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Nelson, K., Landsman, M. K., Tyler, M., & Richardson, B. (1996). Length of service & cost-effectiveness in three intensive family service programs: Final report. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program; Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Palusci, V. J., Crum, P., Bliss, R., & Bavolek, S. J. (2008). Changes in parenting attitudes and knowledge among inmates and other at-risk populations after a family nurturing program. Children & Youth Services Review, 30(1), 79–89.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download