Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 56, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Austin, S. A., & Mbewu, N. (2009). Philani program: A case study of an integrative approach of empowerment and social and economic development. Social Work in Public Health, 24(1-2), 148-160.

Model(s) Reviewed: Philani Outreach Programme

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Barth, R. (1990). Theories guiding home-based intensive family preservation services. In J. K. Whittaker, J. Kinney, E. M. Tracey, & C. Booth (Eds.), Reaching high-risk families: Intensive family preservation in human services (pp. 89-112). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Bath, H. I., Richey, C. A., & Haapala, D. A. (1992). Child age and outcome correlates in intensive family preservation services. Children and Youth Services Review, 14(5), 389-406.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Bergquist, C., Pope, G., & Corliss, K. (1995). Evaluation of Michigan’s Families First program, summary report. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Social Services.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: The text of this study did not arrive in time for the review.
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Blythe, B. J., & Kelly, S. A. (1993). Keeping families and children safe. Reclaiming Children and Youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 1(4), 23-26.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Burns, M. K. (2002). Cementing the cracks: A qualitative study of how parents interpret their experiences as recipients of family preservation services. (Pennsylvania State University; 0176 Advisor: Daniele Flannery). Dissertation Abstracts International, 63 (05A), 267-1666. (AAI3051628)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Campbell, L. (1998). Translating intensive family preservation services across national boundaries: An australian experience. Child Welfare, 77(1), 79-93.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Culp, A. M., Culp, R. E., Anderson, J. W., & Carter, S. (2007). Health and safety intervention with first-time mothers. Health Education Research, 22(2), 285-294.

Model(s) Reviewed: Oklahoma’s Community-Based Family Resource and Support (CBFRS) Program

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Culp, A. M., Culp, R. E., Hechtner-Galvin, T., Howell, C. S., Saathoff-Wells, T., & Marr, P. (2004). First-time mothers in home visitation services utilizing child development specialists. Infant Mental Health Journal, 25(1), 1-15. doi:10.1002/imhj.10086.

Model(s) Reviewed: Oklahoma’s Community-Based Family Resource and Support (CBFRS) Program

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Davies, H. R., Visser, J., Tomlinson, M., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Gissane, C., Harwood, J., & le Roux, I. (2013). An investigation into utilising gestational body mass index as a screening tool for adverse birth outcomes and maternal morbidities in a group of pregnant women in Khayelitsha. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 26(3), 116-122.

Model(s) Reviewed: Philani Outreach Programme

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download