Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 141 - 150 of 354, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Kohl, P. L., & Seay, K. D. (2015). Engaging African American fathers in behavioral parent training: To adapt or not adapt. Best Practices in Mental Health, 11(1), 54.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Kuschel, A., Granic, M., Hahlweg, K., & Hartung, D. (2016). «Nicht von schlechten Eltern!» Effekte einer therapieintegrierten Familienintervention [Children of mentally ill parents. Effects of a therapy-integrated family intervention]. Verhaltenstherapie, 26(2), 83–91.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Lanier, P., Dunnigan, A., & Kohl, P. L. (2018). Impact of Pathways Triple P on pediatric health-related quality of life in maltreated children. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 39(9), 701–708.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Leung, C., Sanders, M. R., Ip, F., & Lau, J. (2006). Implementation of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in Hong Kong: Predictors of programme completion and clinical outcomes. Journal of Children’s Services, 1(2), 4-17.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Leung, C., Sanders, M. R., Leung, S., Mak, R., & Lau, J. (2003). An outcome evaluation of the implementation of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in Hong Kong. Family Process, 42(4), 531-544.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Lewis, R. E. (1990). Service-related correlates of treatment success in intensive family preservation services for child welfare. (University of Utah; 0240 Advisor: Chairman: Peter J. Pecora). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (03A), 248-1003. (AAG9025368)

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Lewis, R. E. (1994). Application and adaptation of intensive family preservation services to use for  the reunification of foster-children with their biological parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 16(5-6), 339-361.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Lewis, R. E. (1995). Institutionalizing intensive family preservation services: A strategy for creating staffing standards based on projections of at-risk children from referral sources. Family Preservation Journal, 1(1) 87-109.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

Lewis, J. (2011). Parenting programmes in England: Policy development and implementation issues, 2005–2010. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 33(2), 107-121.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Lewis, E. M., Feely, M., Seay, K. D., Fedoravicis, N., & Kohl, P. L. (2016). Child welfare involved parents and Pathways Triple P: perceptions of program acceptability and appropriateness. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(12), 3760–3770.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting