Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 41 - 50 of 55, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Lee, J. Y., June, K. J., & Cho, S. H. (2017). Competencies of nurses in a maternal early childhood sustained home-visiting program. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, 28(4), 397–409.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Nguyen, H. N. J., Mensah, F., Goldfeld, S., Mainzer, R., & Price, A. (2022) The complementary impacts of nurse home visiting and high quality childcare for children experiencing adversity. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 58 (S2), 136.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Not a manuscript

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Plastow, L. (2013). Implementing maternal early childhood sustained home visiting in Essex. Journal of Health Visiting, 1(2), 96–103.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Price, A., Bryson, H., Mensah, F., Kemp, L., Bishop, L., & Goldfeld, S. (2017). The feasibility and acceptability of a population‐level antenatal risk factor survey: Cross‐sectional pilot study. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 53(6), 572–577.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Price, A., Bryson, H., Mensah, F., Kemp, L., Smith, C., Orsini, F., Hiscock, H., Gold, L., Smith, A., Bishop, L., Goldfeld S. (2019). A brief survey to identify pregnant women experiencing increased psychosocial and socioeconomic risk. Women and Birth, 32(3), e351–e358.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Price, A., Mudiyanselage, S. B., Schembri, R., Mensah, F., Kemp, L., Harris, D., & Goldfeld, S. (2022). The impact of nurse home visiting on the use, dose and quality of formal childcare: 3-Year Follow-Up of a randomized trial. Academic Pediatrics, 22(2), 233–243.

Model(s) Reviewed: Maternal Early Childhood Sustained Home-Visiting Program (MECSH)

View Manuscript
Indeterminate rating
This manuscript received an indeterminate rating. That means HomVEE reviewers lacked sufficient information on one or more features of the study design required to receive a rating of moderate or high. A rating of indeterminate is not a statement about the quality of the research or the research design.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Rogers, M. M. (1993). The Resource Mothers for Pregnant Teens project: An evaluation of its impact on perinatal outcomes. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53 (12-B), 6253.

Model(s) Reviewed: Resource Mothers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Rogers, C. M. (2004). Voices of adolescent mothers participating in a Resource Mothers Program. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2004); 0005 Adviser: Chair Ann Clark.  Dissertation Abstracts International, 65 (12B), 130-6293. (AAI3157918)

Model(s) Reviewed: Resource Mothers Program

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes; Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Rogers, M., Peoples-Sheps, M., & Sorenson, J. (1995). Translating research into MCH service: Comparison of a pilot project and a large-scale Resource Mothers Program. Public Health Reports, 110(September/October), 563–569.

Model(s) Reviewed: Resource Mothers Program

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study Passes Screens; The text of this study did not arrive in time for the review.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Rogers, M. M., Peoples-Sheps, M. D., & Suchindran, C. (1996). Impact of social support program on teenage prenatal care use and pregnancy outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19(2), 132–140.

Model(s) Reviewed: Resource Mothers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download XLSX