Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 6 of 6, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Boyle, C. L., Sanders, M. R., Lutzker, J. R., Prinz, R. J., Shapiro, C., & Whitaker, D. J. (2010). An analysis of training, generalization, and maintenance effects of Primary Care Triple P for parents of preschool-aged children with disruptive behavior. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41(1), 114-131.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a single-case design study that does not satisfy all ratings determinants or there are an insufficient number of phases and/or assessments per phase.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Navaie-Waliser, M. (2000). An evaluation of the participants, impacts, and cost-effectiveness of the North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Worker program. (home visitation, care coordination, infants). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(7-B), 3239.

Model(s) Reviewed: North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Navaie-Waliser, M., Martin, S. L., Tessaro, I., Campbell, M. K., & Cross, A. W. (2000). Social support and psychological functioning among high-risk mothers: The impact of the Baby Love Maternal Outreach Worker program. Public Health Nursing, 17(4), 280-291.

Model(s) Reviewed: North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Tessaro, I., Campbell, M., O'Meara, C., Herrick, H., Buescher, P., Meyer, R., McGloin, T., Roth, M., & Cross, A. W. (1997). State health department and university evaluation of North Carolina’s maternal outreach worker program. Research Linkages Between Academia and Public Health, a supplement to American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 13(6), 38-44.

Model(s) Reviewed: North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Tsivos, Z. L., Calam, R., Sanders, M. R., & Wittkowski, A. (2015). A pilot randomised controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the Baby Triple P Positive Parenting Programme in mothers with postnatal depression. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 20(4), 532–554.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the measures of effectiveness cannot be attributed solely to the intervention due to a confounding factor.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Women's Health Branch, NC HHS Division of Public Health. Northeastern North Carolina Baby Love Plus Healthy Start impact report 2000 – 2003.Raleigh, NC: Author.

Model(s) Reviewed: North Carolina Baby Love Maternal Outreach Workers Program

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a non-experimental comparison group design study that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download