Research Manuscript Database
Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.
Search By
Maher, E. J., Marcynyszyn, L. A., Corwin, T. W., & Hodnett, R. Dosage matters: The relationship between participation in the nurturing parenting program for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers and subsequent child maltreatment. Unpublished manuscript.
Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)
Marryat, L., Thompson, L., & Wilson, P. (2017). No evidence of whole population mental health impact of the Triple P parenting programme: Findings from a routine dataset. BMC Pediatrics, 17(1), 40.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Martus, J. E. (1993). Benefits of a nurturing program: Perceptions of adolescent mothers. (San Jose State University; 6265 Advisor: Chair: Susan Murphy). Masters Abstracts International, 31 (04), 92-1744. (AAG1353038)
Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 18(3), 274-283.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 274–283.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness and social validity of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in Japanese society. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 87-91.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1525–1525.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matthew, R. F., Wang, M. Q., Bellamy, N., & Copeland, E. (2005). Test of efficacy of model family strengthening programs. American Journal of Health Studies, 20(3), 164–170.
Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)
Mazzucchelli, T. G., Jenkins, M., & Sofronoff, K. (2018). Building Bridges Triple P: Pilot study of a behavioural family intervention for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 76, 46–55.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Facilitating practitioner flexibility within an empirically supported intervention: Lessons from a system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 17(3), 238-252.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting