Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1 - 10 of 40, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Austin, S. A., & Mbewu, N. (2009). Philani program: A case study of an integrative approach of empowerment and social and economic development. Social Work in Public Health, 24(1-2), 148-160.

Model(s) Reviewed: Philani Outreach Programme

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Davies, H. R., Visser, J., Tomlinson, M., Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Gissane, C., Harwood, J., & le Roux, I. (2013). An investigation into utilising gestational body mass index as a screening tool for adverse birth outcomes and maternal morbidities in a group of pregnant women in Khayelitsha. South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 26(3), 116-122.

Model(s) Reviewed: Philani Outreach Programme

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Davies, H. R., Visser, J., Tomlinson, M., Rotherham-Borus, M. J., le Roux, I., & Gissane, C. (2012). An investigation into the influence of socioeconomic variables on gestational body mass index in pregnant women living in a peri-urban settlement, South Africa. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16(8), 1732-1741.

Model(s) Reviewed: Philani Outreach Programme

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Diamond, L. T., & Jarrett, M. H. (1998). “Pride in parenting: Training curriculum for lay home visitors.” NIH-DC initiative to reduce infant mortality in minority populations. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.

Model(s) Reviewed: Pride in Parenting (PIP)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Dugravier, R., Guedeney, A., Saias, T., Greacen, T., & Tubach, F. (2009). Compétences parentales et attachement dans la petite enfance: diminution des risques liés aux troubles de santé mentale et promotion de la résilience (CAPEDP): une étude longitudinale de prévention précoce des troubles de la relation mère–enfant [CAPEDP: A preventive longitudinal study on infant-mother relationship disorders]. Neuropsychiatrie de l'efance et de l'adolescence, 57, 482–486.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study is not written in English

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Dugravier, R., Guedeney, A., Saias, T., Greacen, T., & Tubach, F. (2009). Compétences parentales et attachement dans la petite enfance: diminution des risques liés aux troubles de santé mentale et promotion de la résilience (CAPEDP): une étude longitudinale de prévention précoce des troubles de la relation mère–enfant [CAPEDP: A preventive longitudinal study on infant-mother relationship disorders]. Neuropsychiatrie de l'efance et de l'adolescence, 57, 482–486

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study is not written in English

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Dugravier, R., Tubach, F., Saias, T., Guedeney, N., Pasquet, B., Purper-Ouakil, D., . . . Greacen, T. (2013). Impact of a manualized multifocal perinatal home-visiting program using psychologists on postnatal depression: The CAPEDP randomized controlled trial. PloS One, 8(8), e72216.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Moderate rating
This manuscript received a rating of moderate because it is a randomized-controlled trial with low-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

El-Mohandes, A., Katz, K. S., El-Khorazaty, M., McNeely-Johnson, D., Sharps, P. W., Jarrett, M. H., et. al. (2003). The effect of a parenting education program on the use of preventive pediatric health care services among low-income, minority mothers: A randomized, controlled study. Pediatrics, 111(6) 1324–1332.

Model(s) Reviewed: Pride in Parenting (PIP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with high-attrition that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Foulon, S., Greacen, T., Pasquet, B., Dugravier, R., Saïas, T., Guedeney, N., . . . CAPEDP Study Group. (2015). Predictors of study attrition in a randomized controlled trial evaluating a perinatal home-visiting program with mothers with psychosocial vulnerabilities. PloS One, 10(11), e0142495.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Not applicable (NA) - implementation study
Implementation research

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Greacen, T., Welniarz, B., Purper‐ouakil, D., Wendland, J., Dugravier, R., Saïas, T., . . . Capedp Study Group. (2017). Best practice in individual supervision of psychologists working in the French CAPEDP preventive perinatal home‐visiting program: Results of a Delphi consensus process.Infant Mental Health Journal,38(2), 267–275.

Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download