Research Manuscript Database
Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.
Search By
Maldonado Barsse, D. P. (2023). Cross-sectional associations between anthropometric measures (BMI z-score, waist circumference, waist-to-height-ratio) and cardiometabolic risk factors, among young children in the Guelph Family Health Study. Master’s thesis, University of Guelph. https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/cbc04bf6-3e66…
Model(s) Reviewed: Guelph Family Health Study (GFHS)
Marryat, L., Thompson, L., & Wilson, P. (2017). No evidence of whole population mental health impact of the Triple P parenting programme: Findings from a routine dataset. BMC Pediatrics, 17(1), 40.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 18(3), 274-283.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 274–283.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness and social validity of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in Japanese society. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 87-91.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1525–1525.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Mazzucchelli, T. G., Jenkins, M., & Sofronoff, K. (2018). Building Bridges Triple P: Pilot study of a behavioural family intervention for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 76, 46–55.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Facilitating practitioner flexibility within an empirically supported intervention: Lessons from a system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 17(3), 238-252.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
McConnell, D., Breitkreuz, R., & Savage, A. (2012). Independent evaluation of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in family support service settings. Child & Family Social Work, 17(1), 43-54.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
McLennan, J. D. (2001). Behavioural family therapy reduced disruptive behaviour in children at risk for developing conduct problems. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 4(1), 20-20.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting