Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 581 - 590 of 1801, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Gaven, S., & Schorer, J. (2013). From training to practice transformation. Family Matters, (93), 52-57.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Geib, V. (2009). Niedrigschwellige Familienbildungsprogramme für Familien mit igrationshintergrund: Ein Überblick über innovative Angebote der Elternbildung und frühkindlichen Förderung mit einer empirischen Analyse des Hausbesuchsprogramms HIPPY [Low-threshold family programs for families with migration background: An overview of innovative offers for parental education and early childhood support including an empirical analysis of the home education program HIPPY]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wuerzburg-Schweinfurt University of Applied Sciences, Germany.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study is not written in English
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Gentry, S. V., Powers, E. F. J., Azim, N., & Maidrag, M. (2018). Effectiveness of a voluntary family befriending service: A mixed methods evaluation using the Donabedian model. Public Health, 160, 87–93.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Gerads, S. M., Dagnelie, P. C., Jansen, M. W., van der Goot, L. O., Vries, N. K., Sanders, M. R., & Kremers, S. P. (2012). Lifestyle Triple P: A parenting intervention for childhood obesity. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 267-273.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Gershater-Molko, R. M., Lutzker, J. R., & Wesch, D. (2003). Project SafeCare: Improving health, safety, and parenting skills in families reported for, and at-risk for, child maltreatment. Journal of Family Violence, 18(6), 377–386.

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Gibbons, J., & Thorpe, S. (1989). Can voluntary support projects help vulnerable families? The work of home-start. British Journal of Social Work, 19(3), 189-202.

Model(s) Reviewed: Home-Start

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Outside search years
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Gill, A. M., Dishion, T. J., & Shaw, D. S. (2014). The family check-up: A tailored approach to intervention with high-risk families. Well-Being in Children and Families. 1(18 Pt. 4), 1–21.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Girard, L., Doyle, O., & Tremblay, R. E. (2017). Maternal warmth and toddler development: Support for transactional models in disadvantaged families. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 26(4), 497–507.

Model(s) Reviewed: Preparing for Life—Home Visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Girvin, H., DePanfilis, D., & Daining, C. (2007). Predicting program completion among families enrolled in a child neglect preventive intervention. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(6), 674–685.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Connections (Birth to Age 5)

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study does not examine a relevant target population; no elligible outcomes.
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Glauber, J., Olds, D. L., & Luckey, D. (2005). Can the results be believed? [Letter to the editor]. Pediatrics, 115(4), 1113–1114.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download