Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 1721 - 1730 of 2040, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Smith, J. D., Stormshak, E. A., & Kavanagh, K. (2015). Results of a pragmatic effectiveness–implementation hybrid trial of the family check-up in community mental health agencies. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(3), 265–278.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Study does not examine a relevant target population

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Smith, W., Taki, S., & Wen, L. M. (2020). The role of telehealth in supporting mothers and children during the Covid-19 pandemic. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(3), 37–38. https://doi.org/10.37464/2020.373.168

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Beginnings

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.2

Smith, J. D., Wakschlag, L., Krogh-Jespersen, S., Walkup, J. T., Wilson, M. N., Dishion, T. J., & Shaw, D. S. (2019). Dysregulated irritability as a window on young children's psychiatric risk: Transdiagnostic effects via the Family Check-Up. Development and Psychopathology, 31(5), 1887–1899.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it does not provide adequate information to determine whether outcome measures are valid or reliable.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Smyth, S., & Anderson, G. (2014). Family Nurse Partnership: Meeting the needs of teenage mothers. British Journal of Midwifery, 22(12), 870–875.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Solchany, J. E., & Barnard, K. (2001). Is mom's mind on her baby?: Infant mental health in Early Head Start. Zero to Three, 22(1), 39-47.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
This citation is not a primary study

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Sonuga‐Barke, E. J., Thompson, M., Daley, D., & Laver‐Bradbury, C. (2004). Parent training for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Is it as effective when delivered as routine rather than as specialist care? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 449–457.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because it is a randomized-controlled trial with compromised random assignment that does not satisfy the baseline equivalence requirement.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Barton, J., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Maishman, T., Raftery, J., Stanton, L., Laver-Bradbury, C., Chorozoglou, M., Coghill, D., Little, L., Ruddock, M., Radford, M., Yao, G.L., Lee, L., Gould, L., Shipway, L., Markomichali, P., McGuirk, J., Lowe, M., Perez, E., Lockwood, J., & Thompson, M. J. (2018). A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and cost of specialised individually delivered parent training for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a generic, group-based programme: a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of the New Forest Parenting Programme versus Incredible Years. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(6), 797–809. Study 2.

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Sonuga-Barke, E. J., Barton, J., Daley, D., Hutchings, J., Maishman, T., Raftery, J., Stanton, L., Laver-Bradbury, C., Chorozoglou, M., Coghill, D., Little, L., Ruddock, M., Radford, M., Yao, G.L., Lee, L., Gould, L., Shipway, L., Markomichali, P., McGuirk, J., Lowe, M., Perez, E., Lockwood, J., & Thompson, M. J. (2018). A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and cost of specialised individually delivered parent training for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and a generic, group-based programme: a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of the New Forest Parenting Programme versus Incredible Years. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(6), 797-809. Study 1. 

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

View Manuscript
Low rating
This manuscript received a low rating because the approach used to address missing data is not acceptable according to HomVEE standards or it does not limit potential bias from imputed outcome data in the analytic sample.

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2.1

Spaid, W. M., & Fraser, M. (1991). The correlates of Success/Failure in brief and intensive family treatment: Implications for family preservation services. Children and Youth Services Review, 13(1-2), 77-99.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Spieker, S., Nelson, E. M., & Condon, M. (2011). Validity of the TAS-45 as a measure of toddler-parent attachment: Preliminary evidence from Early Head Start families. Attachment & Human Development, 13(1), 69-90. doi:10.1080/14616734.2010.488124

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
No eligible outcomes; Ineligible study design

Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download