Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Manuscript Rating

Outcome domains examined

States in which the research was conducted

Manuscripts with subgroup findings

Populations served

Child age at the time of enrollment

Delivery Method

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 671 - 680 of 1742, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Healthy Families America. (1996). A role for nurses: Healthy Families America. American Nurse, 28(3), 20.

Model(s) Reviewed: Healthy Families America (HFA)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: HomVEE could not obtain the text of this manuscript
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Heckman, J. J., Holland, M. L., Makino, K. K., Pinto, R., & Rosales-Rueda, M. (2017). An analysis of the Memphis Nurse-Family Partnership Program. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®

View Manuscript
On hold
Screening conclusion: Exclusively reports subgroup findings, pending replication
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Heinrichs, N., Kliem, S., & Hahlweg, K. (2014). Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of Triple P group for parent and child outcomes. Prevention Science, 15(2), 233–245.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Heinrichs, N., Kliem, S., & Hahlweg, K. (2017). Addendum: “Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of triple P group for parent and child outcomes.” Prevention Science, 18(4), 491–503.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Heinrichs, N., Kliem, S., & Hahlweg, K. (2017). Addendum: “Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of triple P group for parent and child outcomes.” Prevention Science, 18(4), 491–503.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Helming, E. (1999). Assistance for families in crisis situations - from the home builders model to the families-first program and family activation concepts in germany. Zeitschrift Fur Padagogik, 39 (supplement), 153-168.

Model(s) Reviewed: HOMEBUILDERS (Birth to Age 5)®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Study is not written in English
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Helping Oklahoma families in greatest need: Preventing child maltreatment. Unpublished manuscript.

Model(s) Reviewed: SafeCare®

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Ineligible study design
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Henninger, W. R., & Luze, G. (2014). Poverty, caregiver depression and stress as predictors of children's externalizing behaviours in a low-income sample. Child & Family Social Work, 19(4), 467-479.

Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Home visiting is not a substantial element of the program
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1

Hentges, R. F., Krug, C. M. W., Shaw, D. S., Wilson, M. N., Dishion, T. J., & Lemery–Chalfant, K. (2020). The long–term indirect effect of the early Family Check–Up intervention on adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms via inhibitory control. Development and psychopathology, 32(4), 1544–1554.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: Does not examine a relevant target population
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 2

Herman, K. C., Reinke, W. M., Bradshaw, C. P., Lochman, J. E., Boxmeyer, C. L., Powell, N. P., . . . Ialongo, N. S. (2012). Integrating the family check-up and the parent coping power program. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 5(3), 208–219.

Model(s) Reviewed: Family Check-Up® For Children

View Manuscript
Does not pass screens
Screening conclusion: This citation is not a primary study
Study reviewed under: Handbook of Procedures and Standards, Version 1
Download