Research Manuscript Database
Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.
Search By
Matos, I., Tereno, S., Wendland, J., Guédeney, N., Panaccione, E., Fuentealba, L., . . . Guédeney, A. (2017). La sensibilité maternelle et la sécurité de l’attachement dans un projet d’intervention précoce [Maternal sensitivity and attachment security in an early intervention project]. Neuropsychiatrie de l’Enfance et de l’Adolescence, 65(4), 219–224.
Model(s) Reviewed: Promoting Parental Skills and Enhancing Attachment in Early Childhood (CAPEDP) Trial
Matone, M., Kellom, K., Griffis, H., Quarshie, W., Faerber, J., Gierlach, P., Whittaker, J., Rubin, D. M., & Cronholm, P. F. (2018). A mixed methods evaluation of early childhood abuse prevention within evidence-based home visiting programs. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22, 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2530-1
Model(s) Reviewed: Early Head Start—Home-based option
Matone, M., O’Reilly, A. L. R., Luan, X., Localio, R., & Rubin, D. M. (2012). Home visitation program effectiveness and the influence of community behavioral norms: A propensity score matched analysis of prenatal smoking cessation. BMC Public Health, 12, 1016.
Model(s) Reviewed: Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)®
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 18(3), 274-283.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 274–283.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness and social validity of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in Japanese society. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 87-91.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1525–1525.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Matthew, R. F., Wang, M. Q., Bellamy, N., & Copeland, E. (2005). Test of efficacy of model family strengthening programs. American Journal of Health Studies, 20(3), 164–170.
Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)
Mazzucchelli, T. G., Jenkins, M., & Sofronoff, K. (2018). Building Bridges Triple P: Pilot study of a behavioural family intervention for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 76, 46–55.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting
Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Facilitating practitioner flexibility within an empirically supported intervention: Lessons from a system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 17(3), 238-252.
Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting