Research Manuscript Database

Search for a study manuscript by keyword or select any filter to see results. For more information about how HomVEE reviews studies, see HomVEE's Methods and Standards Resources.

Filter By

Model

Intervention delivered in non-English language

Setting in which research was conducted

Search By

Displaying 991 - 1000 of 1725, sorted alphabetically Export list of citations

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(3), 274–283.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Investigation of the effectiveness and social validity of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program in Japanese society. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 87-91.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Matsumoto, Y., Sofronoff, K., & Sanders, M. R. (2015). Erratum: “Socio-ecological predictor model of parental intention to participate in Triple P-Positive Parenting Program.” Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(5), 1525–1525.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Matthew, R. F., Wang, M. Q., Bellamy, N., & Copeland, E. (2005). Test of efficacy of model family strengthening programs. American Journal of Health Studies, 20(3), 164–170.

Model(s) Reviewed: Nurturing Parenting Programs (Birth to Age 5)

Mazzucchelli, T. G., Jenkins, M., & Sofronoff, K. (2018). Building Bridges Triple P: Pilot study of a behavioural family intervention for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 76, 46–55.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

Mazzucchelli, T. G., & Sanders, M. R. (2010). Facilitating practitioner flexibility within an empirically supported intervention: Lessons from a system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 17(3), 238-252.

Model(s) Reviewed: Triple P - Positive Parenting Program®—Variants suitable for home visiting

McCann, D. C., Thompson, M., Daley, D., Barton, J., Laver-Bradbury, C., Hutchings, J., Coghill, D., Stanton, L., Maishman, T., Dixon, L., Caddy, J., Chorozoglou, M., Raftery, J., & Sonuga-Barke, E. (2014). Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of a specialist and a generic parenting programme for the treatment of preschool ADHD. Trials, 15(1), 1–41. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-142

Model(s) Reviewed: New Forest Parenting Programme (NFPP)

McCarthy, M., Noonan, M., & Gamse, B. (1998). Exploring differences in year-round and traditional calendar Even Start projects. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.

Model(s) Reviewed: Even Start-Home Visiting (Birth to Age 5)

McCartney, K., & Scarr, S. (1989). Far from the point: A reply to Levenstein. Child Development, 60(2), 517–518.

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model

McCartney, K., Scarr, S., Goldfarb, A., & Hrncir, E. (1983). The screening, assessment and treatment of language delay in young children: An evaluation plan. First Language, 4(10, Pt 1), 63-65.

Model(s) Reviewed: ParentChild+® Family Home Visiting Model